Can GW detectors detect scalar and vector radiation modes?

PAllen
Science Advisor
Messages
9,338
Reaction score
2,543
Literally running out the door, but came upon this. It seems to be a really interesting avenue to test GR vs. other gravity theories using hoped for GW detectors.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2585
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PAllen said:
Literally running out the door, but came upon this. It seems to be a really interesting avenue to test GR vs. other gravity theories using hoped for GW detectors.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2585

That's really interesting! This is essentially a more in depth theoretical analysis of a project I worked this past summer (unfortunately, not published). The prospect is certainly tantalizing, but realistically I am dubious. I've found that the response to scalar radiation modes in a LIGO network is down by roughly a factor of ten as compared to the tensor modes of radiation. As the paper notes, we have some constraints on how strong this scalar radiation can be from the Hulse-Taylor system. So it seems unlikely that if there were a scalar component to radiation that we would be able to detect it with the advanced-LIGO generation of detectors. As far as vector radiation is concerned, the LIGO detectors are generally much more responsive to this (comparable to tensor radiation, actually).

Since scalar modes are present in your run of the mill Brans-Dicke theory, they are the ones I understand the best. I'm not sure entirely how vector radiation is produced, and haven't looked in detail at possible sources for this, so I can't say much about its detection.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
264
Views
31K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top