Testing inequalities on intervals

ucbugrad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How do you see if the following inequality holds true for (-2,0)?

(-x/4)*(x+2)>1

For that matter how do you test inequalities for a given interval in general?

Certainly there must be a way other than to check all values of (-x/4)*(x+2) in (-2,0) and see if they are greater than 1?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ucbugrad said:
How do you see if the following inequality holds true for (-2,0)?

(-x/4)*(x+2)>1

For that matter how do you test inequalities for a given interval in general?

Certainly there must be a way other than to check all values of (-x/4)*(x+2) in (-2,0) and see if they are greater than 1?

This is a quadratic inequality. The usual approach is to bring all the nonzero terms to one side so that the inequality looks like ax2 + bx + c < 0
or
ax2 + bx + c > 0
whichever is appropriate.
The expression ax2 + bx + c can have no real roots, one real, repeated root, or two distinct real roots.

If there are no real roots, the expression ax2 + bx + c is either always positive or always negative.

If there is one repeated root r, the expression equals zero when x = r and will be either always positive or always negative at all other values of x.

If there are two distinct roots r1 and r2, the expression equals zero when x = r1 or when x = r2 and will change sign on either side of both roots. The two roots determine three intervals on the number line: (-∞, r1), (r1, r2), and (r2, ∞). For problems in this category, it suffices to check any number from each of the three intervals. If the expression is negative at that x value, it will be negative for all other x values in that interval. Similarly, if the expression is positive at some point in one of these intervals, the expression will be positive at every other x value in that interval.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top