Testing methods of contaminated jet fuel

  • Thread starter Thread starter djeitnstine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Jet Testing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods of testing for contamination in jet fuel, particularly focusing on approaches suitable for private jet owners. Participants explore various testing methods, industry practices, and the implications of different types of contamination.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is researching jet fuel contamination and seeks information on popular or standard testing methods used in the aerospace industry.
  • Another participant suggests using online resources for research and expresses interest in the findings.
  • A participant mentions that their company does not conduct on-site testing for contamination and emphasizes reliance on suppliers to provide fuel within specifications.
  • Concerns about specific types of contamination, such as microbial contamination (fungal, yeast, sulfur-reducing), are raised, indicating the need for clarity on the type of contamination being discussed.
  • ASTM D-1655 is referenced as a standard for Jet-A distillation, which includes quality control parameters relevant to fuel refining.
  • Participants suggest contacting local suppliers for insights into their quality control practices regarding fuel contamination.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on specific testing methods, and multiple views regarding the responsibility for contamination testing and the types of contamination remain. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the best practices for testing jet fuel contamination.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a lack of specificity regarding the types of contamination being tested for, and the reliance on supplier quality control practices introduces variability in testing approaches.

djeitnstine
Gold Member
Messages
611
Reaction score
0
Hi, as I've stated before I am doing research in the area of jet fuel contamination. However I have shifted my focus to methods of testing. I know many of you work in the aerospace industry. What I need to know if there are any "popular" or "standard" methods you use at your company or perhaps any other information useful on testing.

My aim is to find out what method(s) would be suitable for private jet owners weighing factors such as cost, time, frequency of testing etc..

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is actually pretty interesting. Please post whatever results you find. Have you tried google?

www.googlescholar.com[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah yes I forgot about that service, thank you. Sure I will post my results. What I would also like is for any engineer to give me a run-down on any tests their company uses for contamination. I have not had any luck singling out any methods to categorize within the scope of my research.

I just need a little help narrowing things down a bit.
 
We don't test for contamination on site. It does highly depend on what kind of contamination you are referring to. We rely on the supplier to provide a product within specifications. It is our responsibility to maintain our fuel tanks and systems to prevent contamination of any kind from being introduced into our end product. Many private owners are the same way. That being said we do have many filter points in our farm system that protect our products. The biggest concern is entrained water in the fuel.

ASTM D-1655 is the basis for Jet-A distillation and contains many of the quality control parameters for the refining of the fuel.
http://www.aviationfuel.org/jetfuel/d1655_specs.asp

ASTM has a very large volume on Aircraft fuel system quality control:
http://www.astm.org/BOOKSTORE/PUBS/1573.htm

It would be time well spent to contact some local suppliers to see what their QC folks follow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FredGarvin said:
We don't test for contamination on site. It does highly depend on what kind of contamination you are referring to.

Sorry for my lack of being specific. But microbial (fungal,yeast, sulfur reducing...) contamination.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K