Testing Spring Force in Machine Movement

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a machine designed to test springs by measuring the force exerted on them using an s-type load cell. The spring is initially stretched from 150 mm to 189 mm, with further stretching to 206 mm during operation, while data is logged in Excel. The results calculated using Hooke's law show discrepancies when the servo motor operates at varying frequencies, with the force difference increasing unexpectedly. Participants are questioning whether Hooke's law is sufficient for dynamic conditions and what additional forces might be influencing the results. The complexity of real springs, which are not massless, is highlighted as a potential factor in the observed anomalies.
karter
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

We have been trying to make a machine that tests springs. ( a simple drawing is attached )
We place the spring between two points. The top point has an s-type loadcell attached to get the force data.
The initial size of the spring is 150 mm's. (L0 size)
For the experiment we stretch the spring to 189 mm's and call it L1.
We have an eccentric that is attached to a 5 kw servo motor. It moves the spring up and down 17 mm's each time it rotates.When it rotates the spring is stretched to 206 mm's. (L2)

We continuously get Force data for each rotation. and write it to an excel file.The servo can turn the eccentric 30 times a second.

We have an initial tension (for the aforementioned spring it is 40) and the spring constant is 8.

So according to Hooke's law,

F = IT+k*x we get F = 40+39*8 = 352 N for L1 and for L2 F= 40+56*8 = 488 N I get these results when the machine is not moving.

The problem starts when the servo motor starts running. The servo should run between (1 hz (60 rpm) and 30 hz(1800 rpm)). I can stretch and release the spring 30 times a second. The data we get is not what we expect according to Hooke's law. As the hertz increase the value of F(L2)-F(L1) is getting bigger.

What may be the problem? Is Hooke's law enough for constantly moving springs? Any other forces that may effect the outcome that i overlook?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • ornekMakine.png
    ornekMakine.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 577
Physics news on Phys.org
Real springs are NOT massless.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
958
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K