Testing water pipes with air pressure

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on testing threaded steel pipe systems for leaks using air pressure, specifically at a maximum of 1.5 bar. It establishes that a pressure drop of approximately 0.5 bars over six hours is generally accepted as indicative of system integrity. The conversation highlights the importance of joint sealing under pressure and suggests that the bleed rate is influenced by the number of joints and sealing methods. Additionally, it emphasizes the safety of using liquid for testing due to lower stored energy compared to air.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of air pressure testing principles
  • Knowledge of threaded steel pipe systems
  • Familiarity with leak detection methods, such as soap solution application
  • Awareness of pressure vessel safety standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of joint sealing materials on air pressure testing
  • Learn about pressure testing regulations for gas and liquid systems
  • Explore advanced leak detection techniques beyond soap solutions
  • Investigate the design principles of pressure vessels and their integrity testing
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, plumbing professionals, and safety inspectors involved in the testing and maintenance of piping systems, particularly those working with air pressure and liquid testing methodologies.

TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
Picture a piping system made up of threaded steel pipes. It is to hold regular water at 7-10 bars. When testing the system for leaks, air is used due to a frost issue and the consequences of a larger leak with water. But what holds water doesn't hold air, and so it slowly leaks out. The question is how fast the air should be allowed to leak out before being considered "good enough"? I suppose that is dependent on the number of joints and perhaps what air pressure is applied? Usually we never apply more than 1,5 bar of air pressure during such a test.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the current accepted value?
 
A drop of about 0,5 bars after six hours or so will generally be accepted.
 
Testing pressure vessels or pipes with a gas under pressure is dangerous because of the compressive energy stored in the air. That is probably why a maximum pressure of 1.5 bar is used for the preliminary integrity test. A liquid has much lower stored energy so is safe when testing higher pressures and volumes.

Most pressure vessels and joints are designed to seal better under pressure than without. For that reason it is not only viscosity of the fluid that makes a difference, but may be the increased pressure of the water that better seals the joints.

The bleed rate will be determined by the number of joints being tested and the method / material used to seal those joints. If the number of joints per volume of pipe is reasonably fixed then the pressure lapse rate will be a good indication of integrity, independent of the size of the network being tested.

Do you ever brush a soap solution onto the joints to find the air leaks? That might be quicker than a long pressure test.
 
IMO pressure testing with air is nothing more than a preliminary test. A slow leak on extensive piping will take a long long time to show up as an indicated pressure drop. Fill this piping with liquid and pressurize and the pressure may drop in a matter of seconds or a minute. Naturally it is advisable to test with air first in case there was a completely forgotten connection or something of this nature. After all, who wants to make a mess with liquid spilling?
 
I have worked in similar testing types for liquid systems. A more conventional approach (I do understand that if temperature is dangerous to the fluid we need to reconsider). Charge the system with water, this is important due to the stored energy issue. Than attach a small test rig that has a air chamber similar to a "reverse" head tank. This allows a small buffer and a place to stabilize the pressure due to pump variations. At this point feel free to use your established criteria and still feel good about a controlled predictable amount of stored energy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
950
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K