Textbook Solution Accuracy: Are Rounded Calculations Affecting the Final Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QED-Kasper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the accuracy of textbook solutions in physics, specifically regarding the impact of rounded calculations on final answers. The exercise involves calculating the period, maximum speed, and vibration energy of a bob using the equations T=2π√(l/g), Vmax=2πA/T, and Evib=0.5mv²max. The participant's calculations yielded a vibration energy of 0.48 J, while the textbook stated 0.49 J, leading to the conclusion that textbooks often use rounded intermediate results, which can lead to discrepancies. The consensus is that unrounded values should be used in calculations to ensure accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and pendulum dynamics
  • Familiarity with significant figures and rounding rules in physics
  • Knowledge of basic physics equations related to oscillation
  • Proficiency in using calculators for precise calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of significant figures in physics calculations
  • Explore the differences between theoretical and experimental results in physics
  • Learn about the impact of rounding on numerical accuracy in scientific computations
  • Investigate best practices for reporting results in scientific work
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in scientific calculations who seeks to improve accuracy and understanding of rounding practices.

QED-Kasper
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the answer provided by the textbook solution manual wrong?
Here is the textbook exercise:

A bob with a mass of 0,500 kg is on the end of a long chord and suspended on a pivot (no friction). The distance of the center of mass of the the bob to the pivot-point is 250 cm. The bob is pulled 70 cm from its equilibrium state and then released.

a. Calculate the period.
b. Calculate the speed at which the bob passes its equilibrium state
c. How big is the Vibration energy?

Homework Equations


T=2\pi\sqrt{}(l/g)
Vmax=2\piA/T
Evib=0,5mv2max

The Attempt at a Solution



a. T=2\pi\sqrt{}(2,5/9,81)=3,17187=3,17 s
b. Vmax=2\pi0,7/3,17187=1.386636=1,4 m/s
c. Evib=0,5 x 0,5 x 1,3866362=0,48 J

for c. the textbook got 0,49 J

The textbook calculations are the same except that they use the rounded answers in each consecutive calculation. I thought that the correct way to calculate is to use the unrounded answers and then round the final answer to the correct significant figures. Am I right? Any help will be so much appreciated. (I'm sorry the equations aren't very pretty, it's my first time trying to use this system)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, we're doing this after spring break, so I guess I can't REALLY help.
But, my brother, dad, and aunt have a rant on physics- even though textbooks round every calculation YOU SHOULDN'T. In the end, two decimal places makes a huge difference. Even in high school physics homework. (I was 60 off one time because I put all of my calculations in sig figs)
So anyway, no- don't do that. And yes, books are wrong. Especially if you use Glencoe Physics.
 
Are you sure I'm doing it right? It happened to me a couple of times now, that I used unrounded answers in my calculations, which made my answer slightly different than the one in the textbook. Perhaps I'm using this rule in the wrong situations :s.
 
Never round down intermediate results.

If you report them - report them rounded down, as listing zillions of digits looks ugly and doesn't make much sense (they are mostly just noise), but if you are using them for further calcualtions - use them as you got them. If you have to copy them manually you don't need to copy everything, but using 2 or 3 guard digits is a must.
 
So my answers are correct, and the textbook is wrong?
 
yes. you are definitely right.
 
I agree. This rounding business hangs on from the long-dead age of sliderule calculations where anything over two digits was meaningless. It's been a bit over 30 years since calculators supplanted sliderules in general use in college courses, and it takes about one and one half generations for outmoded rules of thumb to die out...
 
Last edited:
ok thank you very very much guys :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K