The acceleration of falling backwards

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jethrotull
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Falling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing the acceleration of a person falling backwards, simplified to a flat board model on Earth's surface. The classical mechanics approach utilizes the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods, particularly for a rod hinged at one end. Key equations include torque calculated as 1/2 length x sin(angle_from_vertical) x weight, and angular acceleration as torque divided by moment of inertia. Numerical integration techniques, such as using spreadsheets, are suggested for graphing angle versus time during the fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods
  • Knowledge of torque and moment of inertia calculations
  • Basic skills in numerical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lagrangian mechanics for rotational motion
  • Learn about the dynamics of rigid body rotation
  • Explore numerical integration methods for physics simulations
  • Investigate the mathematics of pendulum motion and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of falling objects and rotational motion analysis.

jethrotull
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how you could analyse such things as the acceleration of someone falling directly backwards. The head clearly moves faster than the feet but how can the acceleration of each be measured? What about the acceleration in the middle?

I guess on a amore general level i am looking for an answer that is more simplified than analyzing a person's fall. assume that the person is a flat board on the Earth's surface and their mass is evenly destributed throughout the board.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jethrotull said:
I was wondering how you could analyse such things as the acceleration of someone falling directly backwards. The head clearly moves faster than the feet but how can the acceleration of each be measured? What about the acceleration in the middle?

I guess on a amore general level i am looking for an answer that is more simplified than analyzing a person's fall. assume that the person is a flat board on the Earth's surface and their mass is evenly destributed throughout the board.

This is actually a rather common problem in classical mechanics using the lagrangian/hamiltonian method. It is typically an upright cylinder that is tipping over, with some coefficient of friction between the bottom of the cylinder and the surface. In fact, another variation to this problem is the falling chimney.

Zz.
 
You could consider a rod hinged at one end and consider the period between rod nearly vertical, to rod horizontal.

For a rod rotating about and end point the moment of inertia = mass x length2 / 3 and would be constant.

The torque = 1/2 length x sin(angle_from_vertical) x weight

The angular acceleration = torque / inertia

Then you'd need to determine the relationship of angle versus time. If the rod is vertical, it doesn't fall, so you need to start with some small angle. The equation is complicated, using a pendulum as an example where moment of inertia = mass x length2, 3 times that of a rod pivoting at one end, but otherwise also a constant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_(mathematics)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_(derivations)

I use a spreadsheet to do a crude numerical integration of time, to make a graph of angle versus time starting at +179 degrees, where 180 degrees means vertical:

http://jeffareid.net/misc/rod2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K