The action of a particle point is [tex]\int ds = \int d\tau

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Point
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
The action of a particle point is \int ds = \int d\tau \sqrt{g_{uv} \dot{x}^u \dot{x}^v} (eq1)

the action of hilbert is \int d^x R \sqrt{g}

eq1 is generalization of einstein hilbert action?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, those two actions are unrelated. The Einstein-Hilbert action is effectively the action only for the metric. Extra terms must be added in the presence of matter (if present).

The action you gave for a point particle is one possibility. At least formally, GR with a point particle could be formulated using the sum of your two actions. In practice, though, there are no solutions to the resulting equations of motion. The point particle action is useful mainly in a test particle regime (where the particle's own effects on the metric are ignored).
 


You have to be carefull what your action describes :)

The Hilbert action describes the gravitational field. But it doesn't describe how particles move in it. The same situation you have with electromagnetic fields; the action of the EM-field alone is given by the usual F^2 term, but if you want to describe how charged particles move in this field, you have to describe coupling.

Your first action describes the idea that particles follow geodesics in spacetime. Notice that the metric appears in it, and the solution of this metric is given by your second action: the Hilbert action.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top