The Amount of Human CO2 emissions vs. The Scale of our Atmosphere

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparison of human CO2 emissions to the scale of the Earth's atmosphere, questioning the significance of these emissions in relation to environmental concerns, particularly regarding ecosystems. It touches on themes of environmental impact, ecological fragility, and the perception of risk associated with different pollutants.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant cites a biology teacher's claim that human CO2 emissions are a small fraction of the atmosphere and therefore not a significant concern, suggesting a focus on more fragile ecosystems instead.
  • Another participant challenges this perspective by drawing a parallel to the toxicity of mercury, implying that small amounts of harmful substances can still have significant effects.
  • A further comment questions the amount of mercury released into the atmosphere versus natural waters, indicating a need for context in discussing emissions.
  • It is noted that carbon dioxide is the fifth most abundant gas in the atmosphere, which may imply a need for further exploration of its implications.
  • A later post indicates that the discussion has shifted to current climate predictions, which has led to the thread being locked.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of CO2 emissions relative to the atmosphere and the importance of focusing on other environmental issues. The discussion remains unresolved with competing viewpoints presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the impact of CO2 emissions and the definitions of "significant" in the context of environmental harm. The reference to mercury introduces additional complexity regarding the comparison of different pollutants.

engineertard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My biology teacher asserted to our class that compared to the vastness of the atmosphere of our earth, the amount of harmful gasses we are emitting is a fraction of a percent and therefore can be dismissed as harmless, and instead we should be worrying about more fragile ecosystems down here on top of the crust, like the alarming rate of amphibians going extinct.

So was my biology teacher right, or was she just trying to make a point about taking care of ecosystems?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Offer her an amount of mercury insignificant in mass to the size of her body, see how harmless she thinks that is :)
 
Offer her an amount of mercury insignificant in mass to the size of her body, see how harmless she thinks that

Well how much artificial mercury has been released to atmosphere and how much to natural waters, like the Lady said?

Carbon dioxide is the fifth most abundant gas in our atmosphere.
 
This keeps going off into discussion of current climate and predictions which is a closed topic.

Locked.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K