MHB The amount to save annually should be approximately $18,365.09.

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdulude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finance
AI Thread Summary
To secure a retirement income of $120,000 annually for 28 years starting at age 67, an initial account balance of approximately $2,119,567.59 is needed, assuming a 4% annual interest rate. To achieve this balance, an annual savings of about $18,365.09 is required from age 24 until retirement at age 66. The calculations involve using annuity formulas to determine the necessary savings and account balance. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these formulas for retirement planning. Proper application of these financial principles is crucial for effective retirement savings.
jdulude
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
You have just turned 24, and you intend to start saving for your retirement. You plan to retire in 42 years when you turn 66. During your retirement you would like to have an annual income of $120,000 per year for the next 28 years (until age 94).
-Calculate how much has to be in your account before the first withdrawal at age 67.
-Calculate how much would have to save annually between now and age 67 in order to finance your retirement income and to fill that account.
Make the following assumptions:
-Assume that the relevant compounded interest rate is 4.0 percent for all 70 years
- You make the first payment today and the last payment on the day you turn 66.
-You make the first withdrawal when you turn 67 and the last withdrawal when you turn 94.

k=0.04 n=
These are the type of question that will be on the test and I need to practice
Please help me get on the right path I am sure it is an annuity formula, but I need help solving it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can't find a question in the book to help with this problem

the formula I am using is

A[(1-(1+k)^(-n))/k]
 
Without knowing what formula(s) you are to use, this is how I would approach the problem from a purely algebraic perspective.

I would first let $A$ be the account balance needed at the time of the first withdrawal at age 67. I would observe that there will be $94-67+1=28$ annual withdrawals of \$120,000 made from the account, and we want the account balance to be \$120,000 at the time of the last withdrawal, i.e., we want a balance of \$0 after the last withdrawal.

On your 67th birthday, at the time just before the first withdrawal, the account balance is $A$. Then you make the withdrawal $W$, and the balance is $A-W$.

Assuming interest is compounded annually at an annual rate of $r$, the account balance on your 68th birthday right before the withdrawal is:

$$(1+r)(A-W)$$

And after the withdrawal it is:

$$(1+r)(A-W)-W$$

Continuing in this manner, we will find the account balance right before the $n$th withdrawal is:

$$(1+r)^nA-W\sum_{k=1}^n(1+r)^{k}=(1+r)^nA-W\left(\frac{(1+r)((1+r)^n-1)}{r} \right)$$

Hence, equating this to $W$, and solving for $A$, we find:

$$(1+r)^nA-W\left(\frac{(1+r)((1+r)^n-1)}{r} \right)=W$$

$$A=\frac{W\left((1+r)^{n+1}-1 \right)}{r(1+r)^n}$$

Now plug in the given data:

$$W=120000,\,r=0.04,\,n=28$$

What do you find?

Can you now use a similar method to solve for $S$, the annual savings required to get this account balance?
 
A=1333332.42
 
I appreciate the help but I have to go to the math lab, because there is something I am missing here and I need someone to just show me where I am going wrong. thanks for the help anyways.
 
When I plug those numbers into the formula I gave, I get (to the nearest penny):

$$A\approx2119567.59$$

Until you show what you have tried, we can't really show you where you are going wrong.

To answer the second question, I would let $S$ be the amount annually saved and deposited into the account. You will make $66-24+1=43$ annual deposits.

On your 24th birthday, after the deposit, we have:

$$A=S$$

On your 25th birthday, after the deposit you have:

$$A=(1+r)S+S$$

Continuing, we find on the $n$th birthday after the 24th birthday after making the deposit, we have:

$$A=S\sum_{k=0}^n(1+r)^k=S\frac{(1+r)^{n+1}-1}{r}$$

Equating this to the value of $A$ we found earlier, and letting $n_S$ be the number deposits and $n_W$ be the number of withdrawals after retirement, we have:

$$\frac{W\left((1+r)^{n_W+1}-1 \right)}{r(1+r)^{n_W}}=S\frac{(1+r)^{n_S+1}-1}{r}$$

Solving for $S$, we find:

$$S=\frac{W\left((1+r)^{n_W+1}-1 \right)}{(1+r)^{n_W}\left((1+r)^{n_S+1}-1 \right)}$$

Plugging in the given data, I find:

$$S\approx18365.09$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top