Proof about irrational numbers.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that \(\sqrt{6}\) is irrational, with participants exploring various proof techniques, including proof by contradiction and properties of irrational numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using proof by contradiction, questioning the implications of assuming \(\sqrt{6}\) is rational. There is also exploration of the product of irrational numbers and whether it remains irrational, with some participants suggesting examples and counterexamples.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and questioning the validity of certain statements. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of irrational numbers and the conditions under which their products remain irrational.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of common factors in radicals and the specific case of prime numbers in their arguments. There is an acknowledgment of skipped steps in reasoning and a desire for deeper exploration of counterexamples.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that \sqrt{6} is irrational.

The Attempt at a Solution



Would I just do a proof by contradiction and assume that \sqrt{6} is rational and then get that 6q^2=p^2 which would imply that p is even so I put in p=2r
and then multiply it out. then this would imply that q is also even and this is a contradiction because they would have factors in common. I know I skipped some of the steps. Could I also make an argument that \sqrt{6} is \sqrt{3}\sqrt{2} and then say that an irrational times an irrational is an irrational as long as its not the same irrational.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
Would I just do a proof by contradiction and assume that \sqrt{6} is rational and then get that 6q^2=p^2 which would imply that p is even so I put in p=2r
and then multiply it out. then this would imply that q is also even and this is a contradiction because they would have factors in common. I know I skipped some of the steps.

Sounds good.

Could I also make an argument that \sqrt{6} is \sqrt{3}\sqrt{2} and then say that an irrational times an irrational is an irrational as long as its not the same irrational.

Uuh, that isn't true. There are many counterexamples.
 
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.
 
cragar said:
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.

\sqrt[3]{4}*\sqrt[3]{2}

or

\sqrt{2}*\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

or

\sqrt{18}*\sqrt{2}
 
cragar said:
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.

\sqrt{81} = \sqrt[]{3}\sqrt[]{27}

Damn you Micro you're too quick.
 
ya but all the counterexample have common factors under the radical. I was saying that there, well I was thinking that there were no common factors under the radical.
What if i said a prime number that is square rooted times a different prime that is square rooted will be irrational.
 
rollcast said:
\sqrt{81} = \sqrt[]{3}\sqrt[]{27}

Damn you Micro you're too quick.

Ya snooze, you lose! :biggrin:

cragar said:
ya but all the counterexample have common factors under the radical. I was saying that there, well I was thinking that there were no common factors under the radical.

Then the statement is probably true. But did you prove the statement??
 
Okay tell me if this works. let's assume we have a multiplication of primes to the nth root.
and let's assume that it is rational and that they have no common factors .
(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)^{\frac{1}{n}}=\frac{x}{y}
then we take both sides to then power of n and then multiply the y^n over
and we get y^n(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)=x^n
therefor this implies that x^n is divisible by a prime. so we will now write x=aP
and we get that y^n(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)=(aP)^n
and this would imply that y is divisible by some prime in our list. and this would imply that x and y share a common factor which is a contradiction.
not sure if my last line of reasoning is valid.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K