The Complex Relationship Between Mass & Volume in a White Dwarf

vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
We have the rate of change of number of electrons with energy directly proportional to the volume in an 3-D potential well.
For a white dwarf, the mass is inversely proportional to its volume.

If we consider the electrons in a white dwarf to be in such a potential well, dN/dE becomes inversely proportional to the mass of the white dwarf which,to me, is hard to digest because with more mass the number of electrons is supposed to increase.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
g(E)=kE^(0.5)
g(E) is the density of states, k a constant and E the energy of the state.
dN/dE =kVE^(0.5)
dN/dE is the rate of change of number of electrons with energy.
For a white dwarf,
R=(3.6*10^19)/M^(1/3)
where R is the radius and M the mass of the wd.
Since its volume is in inverse proportion to its mass, dN/dE becomes inversely related to the latter.But dN/dE is supposed to be directly proportional to its mass so that integration over all the energy levels gives more free electrons.
 
Last edited:
I got it.The temperature inside of a white dwarf is about 10^7K, at such temperatures, the distribution function given by
f(E)= [exp(E-Ef)/kT +1]^-1 is approximately 1 for all states, so integration of f(E)g(E)dE gives more electrons per unit volume.
As the volume of the white dwarf lowers, its mass rises, temperature rises bringing f(E) closer to 1.
That doesn't seem correct either.What after the white dwarf has cooled ? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top