The cost of a carbon fiber car chassis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the cost and design considerations for producing a carbon fiber chassis for an electromobile car intended for an efficiency challenge. Participants explore various aspects of chassis design, material choices, and the implications of weight and safety in the context of competition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relevance of high-volume production costs of regular car chassis to custom chassis design for low-volume production.
  • Another suggests that lightweight chassis designs from solar car challenges may provide better insights for the current project.
  • Discussion includes considerations of materials, with some proposing the use of carbon fiber layered with other materials, and the potential costs associated with molds and reinforcements.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of carbon fiber chassis compared to welded tube chassis, particularly regarding ease of modification.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of conducting thorough strength and stress analyses, with one estimating potential costs for analysis and design to be around $100K.
  • There is a recognition that achieving significant weight reductions may lead to disproportionately high costs, complicating the balance between weight and efficiency.
  • Questions arise about the safety of the chassis in real-world driving scenarios, including risks to drivers and pedestrians if the chassis fails.
  • Some participants suggest looking into Shell mileage marathon cars for insights on low drag and efficient designs.
  • Discussion touches on the definition of a "normal" car, with references to historical automotive aerodynamics and current records for mass-production cars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on material choices, cost implications, and design strategies. There is no consensus on the best approach or the feasibility of certain design elements, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the design requirements and the need for compliance with safety regulations. The discussion highlights the challenges of balancing cost, weight, and safety in the context of the competition.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in automotive design, materials engineering, and efficiency challenges may find the insights and discussions relevant.

  • #31
Tom Kunich said:
you can probably use aircraft grade aluminum
or a Titanium tubing frame for an even better strength-to-weight ratio. Kinda pricey though and harder to work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K