The dimensions of elementary particles in quantum physics and string theory

T=0
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I noticed that in quantum physics, an elementary particle has no dimensions, and is point like, but in string theory has one dimension. Why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T=0 said:
I noticed that in quantum physics, an elementary particle has no dimensions, and is point like, but in string theory has one dimension. Why is this?

This may sound silly, but basically it is because the theories are different. String theory is looking at things on a much smaller length scale than quantum theory.
 
Probably you mean "mass dimension"? In supersymmetric theories, the anticommutator of two susy generators Q is equal to the momentum P, which has mass dimension 1. From here, dimension of Q follows: it is 1/2. Similarly, by imposing that the action has 0 dim, you can find that a scalar field has dimension 1, a spinorial field 3/2, etc.
 
Thnx guys, great help.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top