The direction of flux vectors in derivation of conservation of mass

Click For Summary
In the derivation of the conservation of mass, the flux entering and leaving a control volume is based on the assumption that the volume is infinitesimally small, allowing for minimal directional changes in velocity. The conservation law states that any change in mass within the control volume over time must equal the net mass crossing the control surface. The size of the control volume is flexible and can vary during the time interval considered. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying the conservation of mass. This discussion emphasizes the importance of context in interpreting the conservation law.
Mart1234
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the derivation of the conservation law of the conservation of mass, the flux on one side enters and the flux on the other side leaves the control volume. I presume this is due to the assumption that the volume is infinitesimally small and hence v(x,y,z,t) will not change directions dramatically within the control volume. Is this the correct way of thinking about this or am I missing something?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

That sounds plausible, but without the context it's difficult to say.
 
No, what the law of conservation of mass says is that, during a given time interval, any variation of mass inside a control volume must be equal to the net mass that traverses the control surface during that same time interval. Not only the control volume can be of any size, but it can also increase or decrease during that time interval.
 
Hi all, I've looked through design manuals (SDP/SI, Gates, Naismith) and textbooks like Shigley's, but haven't found an equation linking initial belt tension to pulley center-to-center distance for a timing belt. I understand initial tension is typically based on the applied load, but I'm curious: A) Is there a known equation relating tension to C-C distance? B) If not, how might one go about deriving it? Thanks in advance!