The Doppler Effect For EM Waves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the observed wavelength of light emitted by a star moving away from Earth at a speed of 2.4 x 10^8 m/s. The initial approach incorrectly applied a non-relativistic formula for the Doppler effect. The correct relativistic Doppler shift formula must be used due to the high velocity of the star, resulting in an observed wavelength of 1440 nm instead of the initially calculated 7.2 x 10^-6 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler Effect for electromagnetic waves
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Knowledge of wavelength and frequency relationships
  • Basic proficiency in algebra and scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relativistic Doppler shift formula for light
  • Explore the implications of special relativity on wave phenomena
  • Practice problems involving the Doppler effect with varying velocities
  • Investigate the applications of the Doppler effect in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physics enthusiasts, and anyone preparing for exams involving wave mechanics and relativistic effects.

sona1177
Messages
171
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A star is moving away from Earth at a speed of 2.4 x 10^8 m/s. Light of wavelength 480 nm is emitted by the star. What is the wavelength as measured by an Earth observer?

Homework Equations


fo=fs(1 - vrel/c)

I substracted because they the star is moving away from the earth

fo=frequency observed
fs=frequency of source

I know that c/lambda for wavelength of light = (3.0 x 10^8)/(480 x 10^-9)=6.25 x 10^14

So frequency of observor on Earth = (6.25 x 10^14) (1 - (2.8 x 10^8)/(3.0 x 10^8))

Frequency of source = 4.17 x 10^13

Therefore, velocity of source/frequency of source = wavelength observered = (3.0 x 10^8/4.17 x 10^13)= 7.2 x 10^-6 m

This is wrong the answer is supposed to be 1440 nm. what have i done wrong? thanks!

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not using the correct formula for the relativistic Doppler shift, which you need to use since you're dealing with light.
 
vela said:
You're not using the correct formula for the relativistic Doppler shift, which you need to use since you're dealing with light.

Thanks, I just realize that I can't use the formula I was using since the speed of the star and light are very close. I have to use the longer version. Could you please take a look at my question about antennas? I am very confused . . . and I have an exam today. thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
911
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K