The E Field Around a Wire with a Constant Current

AI Thread Summary
When current is suddenly passed through a wire, a localized magnetic field (B field) forms, which induces an electric field (E field) due to the change in the magnetic field, as described by Maxwell's equations. The discussion highlights that while a static B field does not produce a changing E field, it raises the question of whether an E field persists when the current stabilizes and the B field no longer changes. The correct interpretation of Faraday's law indicates that an induced electric field occurs only with a changing magnetic field, not a static one. Participants clarify that while a pulse of electromagnetic radiation is emitted when a solenoid is activated, a stable current does not generate an electric field around the wire. Ultimately, the consensus is that there would be no electric field present once the current stabilizes and the magnetic field becomes static.
enroger
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Consider a wire, if I suddenly pass current on it. There would be an instant localized B field around the wire. Since there is sudden change of B field, there will also be a finite E field. According to Maxwell equation E=B/c.

As the B field spread out the E field will follow, even when the current is stable and B field stop changing the E field will still be there with the B field. But this has got to be wrong right? Otherwise whenever we turn on a solenoid there will be an observable E field around it!??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you mentioned is not valid.

I presume you mean:
\nabla\times\textbf{E}=-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial E}{\partial t}

This Faraday's law:

from Wikipedia:
"Faraday's law of induction states that the induced electromotive force in a closed loop of wire is directly proportional to the time rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop."

So you would get a current in a conductor MOVING through the B-field of a solenoid, but not when static.
 
Neu,

I think you made an error in the LaTex formula (enroger's is not correct, either). The appropriate equation is:

\nabla\times\textbf{H} = \frac{1}{c}( \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\textbf{E}+4\pi \textbf{i})

Differentiating this, to get a time-varying current, and I think you will find that when a solenoid is turned on or off, a pulse of EM radiation is emitted, in accordance with everyday experience. The EEs in the audience should be able to give a better idea of what happens
 
yeah sorry i meant:
\nabla\times\textbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \textbf{B}}{\partial t}
 
The fact that there is a pulse of E field accompany with B field when the solenoid got turn on has no problem. What I want to know is: When there is no change in current a long time after turn on, therefore no change in B field around the wire, would there still be a E field around the wire?

I think the answer is no, but I can't derive that out of maxwell equation. help?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top