The Earth's Magnetic Field & Energy

AI Thread Summary
The Earth's magnetic field at the poles measures approximately 56,000 nT. To replicate this field using electromagnetism, calculations can be made using Maxwell's equations and the energy density formula, U = B²/(2μ), which determines energy per unit volume. Generating stronger magnetic fields is feasible, as demonstrated by MRI machines that can produce fields over 20 Tesla, significantly surpassing the Earth's field strength. The energy required for an electromagnet depends on factors like current, winding density, and losses due to resistance. Maintaining the magnetic field in an electromagnet necessitates continuous power, influenced by these losses and the design of the system.
Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
At the Earths magnetic North (and South) Pole the Earths magnetic field is about 56 000 nT

I wonder hole much energy (approximately ) - kW or Joule should we use if we should produce a similar magnetic field by electromagnetism.

(How can that be calculated?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bjarne said:
At the Earths magnetic North (and South) Pole the Earths magnetic field is about 56 000 nT

I wonder hole much energy (approximately ) - kW or Joule should we use if we should produce a similar magnetic field by electromagnetism.

(How can that be calculated?)

You could use Maxwell's equations... I'm sure there is an easier way but anyhow I can mention that we can generate much stronger fields without too much trouble... Hell, MRI machine for animals (for experimental use) can be over 20 Tesla, that's 357142 times stronger than the Earth's field. (regular MRI machines for people are only 53571 times stronger than the Earth's field however)
 
One way is to simply make a solenoid and pass DC current through it. The magnetic field within the solenoid B = k*I*(N/L), where 'k' is a constant (permeability/2*pi), and N/L the number of turns/length (i.e. turns/cm). You can adjust the magnitude of the B field by adjusting the current, the winding density, or the permeability of the core (e.g. iron vs. air).
 
Bjarne said:
(How can that be calculated?)

You can apply the energy density formula U={{B^2}\over{2\mu}}

This provides energy per unit volume U (in Joules/m^3) using SI units for magnetic field density B and permeability \mu.

So energy will depend on the volume over which you establish the field. There will be additional energy required due to losses. If you use the energy to make a permanent magnet then you don't need to worry about power. However, if you make an electromagnet, this energy field must be maintained by using continuous power. This power will depend on the losses, such as wire resistance in a coil, or cooling power if you use superconductors.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top