The electric field due to a point charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field due to a point charge, specifically in the context of a problem involving two charges and their electric fields. The original poster references a specific problem from a PDF and expresses a desire to grasp the underlying concepts rather than simply obtaining a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for electric fields from point charges and explore the setup of the problem, including the distances involved. There are attempts to derive equations and solve for variables, with questions about the correctness of their mathematical approaches.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and asking clarifying questions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the problem and the interpretation of variables, but there is no explicit consensus on the solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the relationships between the variables and the implications of their mathematical manipulations. There is an emphasis on understanding the physical setup and the mathematical relationships involved.

Jay9313
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
http://www.monmsci.net/~fasano/phys2/Chap22_10.pdf
The question is on this PDF File. It's 22.8. I get the logic of it, the electric fields will be 0 only when they both have the same magnitude. The math is shown below the problem, but i don't understand it. Could someone solve this and show me how to do this step by step?

(You can see I'm not cheating, because if I was, I would just copy the answer out of that page. I want to understand it and do well in this class.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way things work here is that you give it a shot and we provide hints and help.

Are you familiar with the field from a single point charge?
 
Yeah, It's E=((k)(Q))/r^2
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Jay9313! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Which bit do you not understand?

Do you understand (ignoring the constants) 5q/x2 = 2q/(L-x)2 ?
 
The way I was setting this problem up is
(2)/((4 Pi Episilon zero)(x^2)) = (5)/((4 Pi Epsilon zero)(x+L)^2)
Then I would solve, and I used the quadratic formula. I got
(-10 +_ 6.3L)/6

I have no clue how to solve for L, and I don't even know if my math is right
 
Jay9313 said:
Yeah, It's E=((k)(Q))/r^2
Good.

So, at point (x,0), how would you express the field from each charge? What's the distance to each in terms of the givens?
 
I ignored the constants, that was easy. I got to the point where I got a quadratic. 3x^2 + 10xL + 5L^2

Is the quadratic right? How do you solve for a quadratic with two variables? =(
 
Doc Al said:
Good.

So, at point (x,0), how would you express the field from each charge? What's the distance to each in terms of the givens?

Well the fields would be equal to each other. The distance would be (x+L)^2 right?
 
Jay9313 said:
How do you solve for a quadratic with two variables? =(
What two variables? L is a constant. You'll express your answer in terms of L.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
What two variables? L is a constant. You'll express your answer in terms of L.

I got (-10L +_ 6.3L)/6 = 0
How would you solve that? Can you even solve it?
 
  • #11
Jay9313 said:
Well the fields would be equal to each other. The distance would be (x+L)^2 right?
x is the distance from the point to the origin, where q1 is. So what's the distance to q1?

L is the distance between the charges, so what's the distance to q2?
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
x is the distance from the point to the origin, where q1 is. So what's the distance to q1?

L is the distance between the charges, so what's the distance to q2?

Oh! Is is L and x + L?
 
  • #13
Jay9313 said:
Oh! Is is L and x + L?
Not quite. The distance to q1 is x. Is the distance to q2 shorter or longer?
 
  • #14
Oh ok, it's x and x + L , but since it is a function that is squared, it would have to be x-L. So you get (5)/((4 Pi Epsilon zero)(X^2) and you get (2)/(( 4 Pi Epsilon zero)(X-L)^2) right? =D

Then once you cancel terms, you get
5x^2-10xL+5L^2= 2r^2
You then solve the above equation using the quadratic formula, and you get
(10L+2LSqrt(10))/6
The above equation can be simplified by first reducing the 6..
(5L+LSqrt(10))/3)
You can then pull that 3 out to make it look nicer.
(1/3)(5L+LSqrt(10))
Then you can factor out an L
(1/3)(L)(5+Sqrt(10))
And it's not plus or minus Sqrt(10) because it's length, and you can't have a negative length. Am I right? =D
 
  • #15
Thank you so much =D I sat down for lunch, and I was waiting for the food, and I was just thinking about it non stop. Then it slowly started to fit together. =D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K