The Electric Field of a Cylindrical Capacitor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field of a coaxial cylindrical capacitor using Gauss's law. Participants clarify that the electric field strength varies between the inner and outer cylinders, influenced by their charge distributions. The use of Gaussian surfaces is emphasized for determining the electric field, particularly in relation to the capacitor's dimensions and dielectric properties. A suggestion is made to utilize ANSYS for a steady-state analysis of the cylindrical capacitance to obtain precise results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with coaxial cylindrical capacitors
  • Knowledge of electric field calculations
  • Basic skills in using ANSYS for electromagnetic simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in cylindrical geometries
  • Learn how to model coaxial capacitors in ANSYS
  • Research the relationship between electric field strength and capacitance
  • Explore the effects of dielectric materials on capacitor performance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and professionals involved in capacitor design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

seekingaeolus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. How do we calculate the electric field of a Coaxial Cylindrical Capacitor??

That is one question, the other is:

Is the field strength E the same at all locations of a uniform electric field at any point between the plates or electrodes of a parallel plate capacitor, and or a cylindircal capacitor?


2. Gaussian Symmetry?



3. Not sure...found the field of a point charge...

ANY ASSISTANCE WOULD BE HELPFUL!

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For your first question, yes you use Gauss's law. Now imagine for a coaxial capacitor, the inside of it has a charge +Q and the outside has a charge -Q. Which of these (or both) contribute to the electric field in the capacitor according to gauss's law?

Now with this, you should be able to figure out the electric field.
 
Still very lost.

When I looked at Gauss's law, I gathered that the elctric flux \phi

is equal to E0 *(2*\pi*LR3/r2

And I also found that the Electric field of a long charge wire is equal to

E = \lambda/2*\pi*\epsilon0Lr

?

I'm not sure how to use Gauss's law here.

From my understanding, if my inner cylinder has a net positive charge of Q and my outer cylinder has a net negative charge -Q then my electric field will extend from the inner cylinder to the outer cylinder, increasing in strength from radius R to radius r

ie from the radius of my inner cylinder to the radius of my outer cylinder.

However. when I draw the gaussian surface to represent this, I do not know where to begin the cylinger to determine the charge enclosed. This could be for any abitrary cylinder value ranging from 1/2 into 6 in depending on what diameter pipe I use...

I realize that in order to maintain field strength integrity to the narrowest bandwidth, or sharpest, most consistent field strength, then the distance between the two electrodes needs to be as close as practically possible. However, I am unsure as to what kind of field strength changes I can predict per the size of the electrodes. In other words, how different will the field be if the pipes are larger in diameter or smaller in diameter...or will that even affect the field strength inside the capacitor??

Can you help me with this?
 
seekingaeolus said:
However. when I draw the gaussian surface to represent this, I do not know where to begin the cylinger to determine the charge enclosed. This could be for any abitrary cylinder value ranging from 1/2 into 6 in depending on what diameter pipe I use...
The Gaussian surface should be in the shape of a cylinder for you to be able to exploit symmetry. So what does Gauss law applied to that Gaussian surface tell you about the the strength of the electric field?



I realize that in order to maintain field strength integrity to the narrowest bandwidth, or sharpest, most consistent field strength, then the distance between the two electrodes needs to be as close as practically possible. However, I am unsure as to what kind of field strength changes I can predict per the size of the electrodes. In other words, how different will the field be if the pipes are larger in diameter or smaller in diameter...or will that even affect the field strength inside the capacitor??

Can you help me with this?
What pipes are you talking about?
 
I am making a coaxial cylindrical capacitor with a dielectric constant of roughly 87.9

The cylinders are stainless steel tubing about .1 meter long, concentrically spaced approximately 1 mm apart (as of right now. depending on what kind of results I get from this calculation, the spacing might be different)

I am trying to find a relationship to associate electric field strength as a function of capacitance. The charge Q plays an important role as the bridge between field strength and capacitance, with applied voltage being an independent variable that I consider as something I can vary to get the proper output...ie somewhere between 8 and 14 volts...unless a coil is needed to jump up my voltage higher...

With luck I can find the relationship, therefore finding a capacitor design that will give me the necessary field strength within certain design constraints and parameters.
 
Hi

Im not sure what your standard of education is, but you could very easily do a steady state analysis of the cylindrical capacitance on ANSYS to give you all the results you are looking for.

Pick a 2D plane 121 element and draw the cross section of the capacitor, that is an annulus. Material properties - electromagnetic - relative permittivity - 'enter value'
apply voltage loads on the 2 circles on the cross section and solve.

Hope that helped.

Can u please tell me what application you are using this for?

Cheers
Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K