What are the commutation relations for the electroweak gauge bosons?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the commutation relations of electroweak gauge bosons, specifically involving Pauli matrices. The user presents an exercise requiring proof of a specific equation involving these matrices and their associated components. A proposed solution is provided, but the user struggles to complete the proof. Another participant raises concerns about the notation and suggests that the left side of the equation appears to be a 2x2 matrix, questioning the validity of the equation as presented. The conversation highlights the complexities and potential misunderstandings in the mathematical formulation of the problem.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

I have the following exercise about the The electroweak gauge bosons commutations relations:

Homework Statement



If ## [ \tau_i ,\tau_k] = 2 i \epsilon_{ikl} \tau_l ## and
## \{ \tau_i ,\tau_k\} = 2 \delta_{ik} ##

where ## \bar{\tau} ## are the Pauli matrices,

Then prove that:
(1) ## \bar{ \tau} \bar{A_\alpha} . \bar{ \tau} \bar{A^\alpha} = ( A_\alpha^1 + i A_\alpha^2) ( A^{\alpha, 1} - i A^{\alpha, 2} ) + A_\alpha^3 A^ {\alpha,3} ##



The Attempt at a Solution



I said that
## \tau_i \tau_k = \delta_{ik} + i \epsilon_{ikl} \tau_l ##, then

## \bar{ \tau} \bar{A_\alpha} . \bar{ \tau} \bar{A^\alpha} = \bar{A_\alpha} \bar{A^\alpha} + i \epsilon_{ikl} \tau_l \bar{A_\alpha} \bar{A^\alpha} ##

But I can't complete for the next step to prove the enquiry ..

Bests,
Safinaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That notation is confusing. The left side of equation (1) seems to be a 2x2 matrix while the right side isn't. That only makes sense if we assume there is implicit unit matrix on the right side. But the equation still doesn't seem right. Doesn't it simplify to Aμ.Aμ ?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top