The Existence of Symmetric Matrices in Subspaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of symmetric matrices within a 4-dimensional subspace \(U\) of \(3 \times 3\) matrices. It is established that the dimension of the subspace of symmetric matrices \(\mathcal{S}\) is 6. By applying the Grassmann theorem, the dimension of the sum of the subspaces \(U\) and \(\mathcal{S}\) is calculated to be 10, which exceeds the dimension of the space of \(3 \times 3\) matrices (9). This contradiction confirms that \(U\) must contain at least one non-zero symmetric matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly subspaces and dimensions.
  • Familiarity with symmetric matrices and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the Grassmann theorem and its applications in linear algebra.
  • Basic understanding of matrix operations and dimensions in vector spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Grassmann theorem in detail to understand its implications in linear algebra.
  • Explore the properties of symmetric matrices and their applications in various mathematical contexts.
  • Learn about the dimensions of matrix spaces and how to calculate them for different types of matrices.
  • Investigate the relationship between subspaces and their intersections in vector spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of matrices and subspaces will benefit from this discussion.

Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I am stuck on. Hope you can provide some hints. :)

Problem:

Let \(U\) be a 4-dimensional subspace in the space of \(3\times 3\) matrices. Show that \(U\) contains a symmetric matrix.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you mean a symmetric matrix different from $0.$ If $\mathcal{S}$ is the subspace of the symmetric matrices, then $\dim \mathcal{S}=\dfrac{3(3+1)}{2}=6.$ If $\dim (\mathcal{S}\cap U)=0,$ then by the Grassmann theorem $\dim (U+\mathcal{S})=6+4-0=10>9=\dim \mathbb{K}^{3\times 3}$ (contradiction). So, there exists a symmetric and non null matrix belonging to $U.$
 
Fernando Revilla said:
I suppose you mean a symmetric matrix different from $0.$ If $\mathcal{S}$ is the subspace of the symmetric matrices, then $\dim \mathcal{S}=\dfrac{3(3+1)}{2}=6.$ If $\dim (\mathcal{S}\cap U)=0,$ then by the Grassmann theorem $\dim (U+\mathcal{S})=6+4-0=10>9=\dim \mathbb{K}^{3\times 3}$ (contradiction). So, there exists a symmetric and non null matrix belonging to $U.$

Yes indeed, it should be different from the zero matrix. Thanks very much for your reply. I understand it fully. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K