The fate of the vector potential in the case of the existence of a mag

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of magnetic monopoles on the vector potential in classical electrodynamics. It establishes that while the magnetic field is typically represented as a vortex through the vector potential, the introduction of monopoles necessitates a reevaluation of Maxwell's equations in four-dimensional form. The equations, expressed as ∂μ∂μAν = jν, require modification when considering monopoles, leading to questions about the validity of the vector potential concept. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in representing Maxwell's equations in terms of fields rather than potentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of vector potentials and their role in electromagnetism
  • Basic concepts of magnetic monopoles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of magnetic monopoles on electromagnetic theory
  • Research modifications to Maxwell's equations in the presence of monopoles
  • Explore the mathematical representation of vector potentials in four-dimensional space
  • Examine the historical context and theoretical developments surrounding magnetic monopoles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between magnetic monopoles and vector potentials in classical electrodynamics.

sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17
The vector potential in classical electrodynamics can be introduced due to the fact that the magnetic field is the vortex:
div \vec B = 0 → \vec B = rot \vec A
In the four-dimensional form (including gauge) Maxwell's equations look particularly beautiful:
\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu} = j ^{\nu}
where A^{\nu} - 4-potential.

Given the existence of a monopole, the magnetic field is no longer a vortex. Then, how to change the form of Maxwell's equations in 4-dimensional form (via potentials)? Whether to reject the concept of the vector potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
614
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K