The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and its implications for understanding polynomial roots, particularly in relation to the quadratic formula and the study of complex analysis and abstract algebra. Participants explore the connections between these mathematical concepts and their intuitive understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the quadratic formula is a specific example of a general root-finding algorithm for nth degree polynomials.
  • Another participant notes that the quadratic formula provides real and complex roots for 2nd degree polynomials but cannot be used for higher degrees.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between complex analysis and abstract algebra, with some suggesting that both fields have small intersections at the introductory level.
  • Some participants express that one can study either complex analysis or abstract algebra without needing to complete the other first, although they note differences in course levels.
  • A participant highlights that while there are formulas for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree equations, no general formula exists for 5th degree equations or higher, which leads to the study of abstract algebra.
  • Complex analysis is mentioned as providing insights into why every polynomial of degree n has n complex roots, along with other proofs that do not rely on complex analysis.
  • There is an interest in the visual representation of polynomial roots, with a reference to an article showcasing images of roots from various polynomial classes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the order of studying complex analysis and abstract algebra, with no consensus on a preferred approach. The discussion remains open regarding the best path for understanding polynomial roots and their properties.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the understanding of polynomial roots may depend on the definitions used and the mathematical background of the learner. There are also references to the flexibility in course paths within mathematics departments, indicating that individual experiences may vary.

V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to say first of all that I am not looking for any specific answers, just hoping someone could shed a light on the subjects at hand.

Is the quadratic formula a specific example of some general root finding algorithm that solves for the n (or n-1?) roots of a nth degree polynomial? Kind of like the Pythagoras theorem is a specific example of the law of cosines for right triangles?

How do I understand those concepts intuitively? Should I learn complex analysis to get how the complex roots work out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Great question.

I think that by asking these types of questions you will help yourself to understand complex concepts intuitively. So keep it up.

The quadratic formula gives us the real and complex roots of a 2nd degree polynomial. We can not use it to solve higher degree polynomials.

Sometimes the quadratic will just give us one answer for x. This is a case where we have found a root with multiplicity 2. This concept is a bit tough to explain. Here is a link to give an exact definition. See if you can understand it: Wikipedia.

Complex analysis will certainly help, but I think the real meat and potatoes is in a general field of mathematics that some people refer to as Abstract Algebra.

I hope I have helped.
 
Thanks! Would you say I should learn complex analysis first or abstract algebra? Or are the two unrelated enough that it won't matter?
 
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
Thanks! Would you say I should learn complex analysis first or abstract algebra? Or are the two unrelated enough that it won't matter?

The two have small intersection at the introductory level. Neither are prerequisites for the other. But I have found that there are junior level complex analysis classes, while algebra does not come till senior level.
 
algebrat said:
The two have small intersection at the introductory level. Neither are prerequisites for the other. But I have found that there are junior level complex analysis classes, while algebra does not come till senior level.

That is a great observation! There definitely is a lot of intersection between the two fields.

And V0ODO0CH1LD, I would talk to your teachers and/or professors and see what they think. But personally when I was in school, I took an Abstract Algebra introductory class with just a basic knowledge of complex numbers. I'd say you could take an first course in either, in any order and turn out OK.
 
Diffy said:
That is a great observation! There definitely is a lot of intersection between the two fields.

And V0ODO0CH1LD, I would talk to your teachers and/or professors and see what they think. But personally when I was in school, I took an Abstract Algebra introductory class with just a basic knowledge of complex numbers. I'd say you could take an first course in either, in any order and turn out OK.

Right, since complex analysis is not considered on the main track, some people take algebra without ever having taken complex analysis. There is some flexibility in paths through a math department.

For instance, a computer scientist might conceivably take algebra (maybe combinatorics is even more likely) but not complex analysis, while the the closely related field of electrical engineering might use more from complex analysis.
 
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
I just wanted to say first of all that I am not looking for any specific answers, just hoping someone could shed a light on the subjects at hand.

Is the quadratic formula a specific example of some general root finding algorithm that solves for the n (or n-1?) roots of a nth degree polynomial? Kind of like the Pythagoras theorem is a specific example of the law of cosines for right triangles?

How do I understand those concepts intuitively? Should I learn complex analysis to get how the complex roots work out?

There's a formula for 2nd degree equations -- quadratics. There's a formula for third-degree equations (cubics). There's a formula for fourth degree equations (quartics). But there is NO general formula for solving 5th degree equations or higher.

To learn about that, you'd study abstract algebra.

What you'd learn from complex analysis is a proof that every polynomial of degree n has n complex roots. But there are other proofs that don't explicitly use complex analysis. But from complex analysis you'd understand why the n roots of the polynomial zn = 1 are the vertices of a regular n-gon in the plane -- a very cool fact indeed.

So it sounds like you'd be more interested in abstract algebra if you want to learn about formulas for finding roots; and complex analysis if you're interested in the roots in general.

Here's a fascinating article about the beautiful images you get when you plot all the roots of various classes of polynomials.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/roots/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K