The Fundemental Theorum Of Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter undrcvrbro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) and its application through u-substitution in the integral \int^{3}_{2}12 * (x^2-4)^{5} * x \, dx. The user clarifies the process of u-substitution by defining u = x^2 - 4 and determining that du = 2x \, dx. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the chain rule and understanding the relationship between du and dx in integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Knowledge of u-substitution in integration
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Ability to manipulate derivatives and integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Practice u-substitution with various polynomial functions
  • Explore the chain rule in more complex integration problems
  • Review common mistakes in calculus integration techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and u-substitution methods.

undrcvrbro
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
the fundamental theorem of calculus

Homework Statement


\int^{3}_{2}12 * (x^2-4)^(5) * x


Homework Equations


U substitution.


The Attempt at a Solution


This is part of a FTC problem, but I find myself stumbling a little bit with the u substitution still. I'm not sure when the du= the derivative of the u, and when it is just the numbers left over.

Like in this situation, I set u=x^2-4. Would du=2x or 12x?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If u = x2 - 4, then the derivative du/dx = 2x. Although we technically shouldn't break up the derivative, it turns out we can do it without affecting results, and all our steps are justifiable with the chain rule. Commonly, however, we treat du/dx as a fraction, and find du = 2xdx \implies dx = du/(2x).
 
Thanks. Now that I look closer, I think my only issue was that I seemed to have been seeing some coincidental pattern on a few of my problems a while back and drew the conclusion that it was mathematically correct. I always do dumb stuff like that:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K