The Group A_4 as a Split Extension.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the group theory problem concerning the alternating group A_4 and its structure as a split extension of a subgroup H, which consists of elements of A_4 with exponent 2, by the group \mathbb{Z}_3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a surjective homomorphism from A_4 to \mathbb{Z}_3, with the kernel being the subgroup H. They express uncertainty about how to map the elements of A_4 not in H to the elements of \mathbb{Z}_3.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance regarding the mapping of elements and the nature of the homomorphism. The original poster acknowledges a realization about the nature of the mapping, leading to a completion of their solution. However, another participant questions the validity of a subgroup construction mentioned earlier, indicating ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for a subgroup of order 3 within A_4, and the discussion includes considerations of equivalence classes of elements in A_4 that relate to the mapping to \mathbb{Z}_3.

quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,564
Reaction score
24

Homework Statement


Let [itex]H[/itex] be all the elements of the alternating group [itex]A_4[/itex] of exponent 2. Show that [itex]A_4[/itex] is a split extension of [itex]H[/itex] by [itex]\mathbb{Z}_3[/itex].


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already shown that [itex]H[/itex] is normal in [itex]A_4[/itex]. I also have the proof of the following proposition:

Let [itex]H[/itex] and [itex]K[/itex] be groups whose orders are relatively prime and let [itex]f:G \rightarrow K[/itex] be an extension of [itex]H[/itex] by [itex]K[/itex]. Then the extension splits iff [itex]G[/itex] has a subgroup of order [itex]|K|[/itex].

Let [itex]H=H[/itex] (as defined in the problem statement), let [itex]K=\mathbb{Z}_3[/itex], and let [itex]G=A_4[/itex]. Then certainly the orders of [itex]H[/itex] and [itex]K[/itex] are relatively prime. Also, [itex]A_4[/itex] certainly has a subgroup of order 3. Just take the identity, a product of disjoint transpositions, and its inverse and you have a subgroup. So referring back to the definition of an extension, I've reduced the problem to finding a surjective homomorphism [itex]f: A_4 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_3[/itex] with [itex]\ker(f)=H[/itex].

Now I'm stuck. I know I need the homomorphism to map all 4 elements of [itex]H[/itex] to 0 in [itex]\mathbb{Z}_3[/itex]. But there doesn't seem to be enough variety in the remaining elements of [itex]A_4[/itex] for me to decide which of them should be mapped to 1 and which should be mapped to 2.

Little help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter, there's an automorphism of Z_3 taking 1 to 2. Remember the map is constant on cosets of H.
 
Good grief, I can't believe I didn't notice that. :redface:

Thank you.
 
I finished the problem. In case anyone's interested, here's the rest of the solution. Not being a mathematical genius, I had to write out the multiplication table for the elements of [itex]A_4[/itex] that are not in [itex]H[/itex]. I noticed that there were two distinct equivalence classes of elements, that when multiplied by each other give an element of [itex]H[/itex] and when multiplied by an element of the other class given an element of [itex]A_4[/itex] not in [itex]H[/itex]. So I arbitrarily chose to send one class to 1 and the other to 2 (in [itex]\mathbb{Z}_3[/itex], that is).

Elements going to 1:
(1 2 3)
(1 4 2)
(1 3 4)
(2 4 3)

Elements going to 2:
(1 3 2)
(1 2 4)
(1 4 3)
(2 3 4)

Clearly, [itex]f[/itex] defined in this way is a surjective homomorphism from [itex]A_4[/itex] to [itex]\mathbb{Z}_3[/itex] whose kernel is [itex]H[/itex]. And now that I'm done, I see that I have an even slicker proof that [itex]H[/itex] is normal in [itex]A_4[/itex], since it is the kernel of a homomorphism out of [itex]A_4[/itex]. I rule. :cool: :biggrin:
 
I caught a mistake in the opening post.

Tom Mattson said:
Also, [itex]A_4[/itex] certainly has a subgroup of order 3. Just take the identity, a product of disjoint transpositions, and its inverse and you have a subgroup.

That doesn't give a subgroup at all. To get the desired subgroup of order 3 you have to take the identity, a 3 cycle, and its inverse.

OK, I think I'm finally done with this. :zzz:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K