- #1
LogicalAtheist
Illogic At Work
Because my introductoary post was trashed with poor statements, I
wanted to bring it to a new post, where people here can discuss it.
This is not a personal attack. When one makes strange anti-science claims, one will receive a massive argument.
LA - "Evolution is a system of Evolutionary Agents, and the widely accepted agents (about 3 to 5 of them) are widely accepted BECAUSE they've been seen in all ecosystems on this planet. This is evident even in my introductory Biology book. I have performed many labs where I had to show, from scratch, the entirity of a given agent."
N - "Evolution has NOT been proven true yet and if these scientists couldn't prove it right I am certain you can't without bending information to try to suit your purposes."
LA - "So, what biology majors are doing in every lab in every university in the country, and the backbone of biology, from which all information since proven correct in biology lies on, is all incorrect?Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Let's look at N's wonderful evidence.
N - "There isn't even enough evidence that humans evolved has several others here have agreed that there simply isn't enough evidence. "
LA - Babbling onward, N says something about humans evolving, hasn't happened? Also he says something about the Bible is just as equal a scientific source of knowledge. Again, I receive no evidence for such a strange claim.
N - "Ok if you INSIST there is proof that evolution happened where as you still haven't given any real proof say it did happen. Did a lifeform just pop up outta nowhere and begin to evolve? No if intelligent life came from evolution it was by gods will and the life he created."
LA - N cannot pick a single evolutionary agent for me to quickly explain. In my biology intro course, I had to go into a given REAL ecosystem, and identify the agents at work. They're quite simple, and they were indeed there. Avoidance of providing evidence usually means there is none to provide.
LA - Furthermore, he makes the grave error of "believeing" (no he doesn't put a thought process into it at all) that evolution has anything to do with the origin of life on Earth. Obviously he didn't read my recent column. My column alone would have trippled his knowledge on the subject.
So, provide your evidence. No ad hominems. Evidence to disprove such fundamental claims
Because my introductoary post was trashed with poor statements, I
wanted to bring it to a new post, where people here can discuss it.
This is not a personal attack. When one makes strange anti-science claims, one will receive a massive argument.
LA - "Evolution is a system of Evolutionary Agents, and the widely accepted agents (about 3 to 5 of them) are widely accepted BECAUSE they've been seen in all ecosystems on this planet. This is evident even in my introductory Biology book. I have performed many labs where I had to show, from scratch, the entirity of a given agent."
N - "Evolution has NOT been proven true yet and if these scientists couldn't prove it right I am certain you can't without bending information to try to suit your purposes."
LA - "So, what biology majors are doing in every lab in every university in the country, and the backbone of biology, from which all information since proven correct in biology lies on, is all incorrect?Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Let's look at N's wonderful evidence.
N - "There isn't even enough evidence that humans evolved has several others here have agreed that there simply isn't enough evidence. "
LA - Babbling onward, N says something about humans evolving, hasn't happened? Also he says something about the Bible is just as equal a scientific source of knowledge. Again, I receive no evidence for such a strange claim.
N - "Ok if you INSIST there is proof that evolution happened where as you still haven't given any real proof say it did happen. Did a lifeform just pop up outta nowhere and begin to evolve? No if intelligent life came from evolution it was by gods will and the life he created."
LA - N cannot pick a single evolutionary agent for me to quickly explain. In my biology intro course, I had to go into a given REAL ecosystem, and identify the agents at work. They're quite simple, and they were indeed there. Avoidance of providing evidence usually means there is none to provide.
LA - Furthermore, he makes the grave error of "believeing" (no he doesn't put a thought process into it at all) that evolution has anything to do with the origin of life on Earth. Obviously he didn't read my recent column. My column alone would have trippled his knowledge on the subject.
So, provide your evidence. No ad hominems. Evidence to disprove such fundamental claims
Last edited by a moderator: