The James Webb Space Telescope

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
545 replies · 66K views
phinds said:
what's the big deal w/ 4.6 billion years old?
I understand this to be the distance to the SMACS 0723 group, not the faint galaxies in the background.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and BillTre
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Im furious. What is the point of setting a date have this dramatic count down after 198 days of biting our nails then release an image. The night before?

It's kind of tainted it for me. The purity. It's like uncle Barney turning up drunk on Xmas Eve morning and opening one of your kids Xmas presents and handing it to them over toast and marmalade.My day is still as planned. Day off work with the OFFICIAL time of first light.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, Borg and Jarvis323
berkeman said:
Yeah, what the heck does Biden have to do with a NASA release? And the news articles say it would happen at 5:30PM US Eastern Time, which was an hour ago and no images anywhere that I can find so far...
Yes not happy. I've barely looked at the image. First light for me is 3.30pm BST.
EDIT. Today!
 
[quote of now-banned member deleted by the Mentors]

Nothing to do with that. I am British and actually thought this administration would be more pro Science. That's good.
My point is there was a schedule, a critical path that people have been following for months admiring a MULTI national Scientific collaboration.
ESA, CSA and NASA plus private companies.

If senior members of government or the CIC wanted a private viewing before anyone else that's fine.
Ticker tape parade and huge party afterwards that's fine. I'm sure NASA have already and have plenty more champagne on ice.
11th hour televised viewing for me is hi jacking the event to feed off the publicity.
Probably not his idea.
Anyway this post could get bumped. That's fair enough, the P word is not discussed on this forum.

The ACTUAL event is in a few hours, 199 days of waiting. Day 198 I will forget for now. Time to check Webb to see if the final mode is complete.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This structure stands out as the strangest in the image to me. Any idea what it is?

1657624314958.png
 
Whether you like Biden or not its just seems a bit silly to have any president present this.

In any case, i thought it clearly said on NASA website that the galaxy cluster imaged at 4.6 billion years old was gravitationally lensing some background galaxies, of which are far older and sharper than the Hubble images, on less exposure time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Jarvis323, anorlunda and 2 others
JLowe said:
Whether you like Biden or not its just seems a bit silly to have any president present this.
It's normal for US presidents to make photo ops out of anything good that happens on their watch. Nothing new or odd about that and certainly not silly, given American politics.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, Oldman too, protonsarecool and 1 other person
Jarvis323 said:
This structure stands out as the strangest in the image to me. Any idea what it is?

View attachment 304053
better_main_image_3.jpg
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, pinball1970, Jarvis323 and 1 other person
The picture looks amazing, the detail is amazing. Of course more (deeper) pictures to come.
Jarvis323 said:
This structure stands out as the strangest in the image to me. Any idea what it is?
Some galaxy distorted due to gravitational lensing I suppose.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Jarvis323
C5FD5EA4-7775-451D-9950-B82E9B5A61D3.jpeg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BWV and Oldman too
E7AC6549-36F4-438F-9105-7680792913D2.jpeg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BWV, pinball1970 and Oldman too
B6CBFB06-D1BD-4B1F-A841-CE7B6FC9CFAD.jpeg
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: BWV, Borg, pinball1970 and 1 other person
The presentation was beyond cringe. Awful. Absolutely hated it. I'm surprised they did not put in a few adverts for burgers and fries...

That said the images were amazing and all that data will be making the science community very excited.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Borg said:
Check out Google today.
LOL, forgot to remove the lens cap! :smile:
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Ibix said:
...it hadn't sunk in how big the thing is until I saw that photo. I presume that's a 1:1 scale model.
Tennis court!
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and Ibix
Ibix said:
...it hadn't sunk in how big the thing is until I saw that photo. I presume that's a 1:1 scale model.
Yes, it's a full scale model
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and Ibix
Vanadium 50 said:
No point in launching a small telescope.
Sure. It was just one of those moments of difference between knowing the dimensions and grokking them, if you see what I mean.
 
I think that now is the time to declare JWST as an outstanding success. Bravo to the JWST team.

The James Webb Space Telescope is an international collaboration among NASA, the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA).
  • NASA: Overall responsibility for the mission
  • ESA: Provides the Near Infrared Spectrograph, Mid-Infrared Instrument Optics Assembly, and the Ariane Launch Vehicle
  • CSA: Provides the Fine Guidance Sensor/Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph

As an engineer, I was very skeptical that they could make such a long chain of critical steps succeed on the first and only try. I'm delighted to be proven completely wrong.

JWST deserves it's place in my earlier thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/bold-monster-engineering-successes.1003708/
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Crc, DennisN, BillTre and 5 others
I wonder if someone can answer a question for me. Probably a silly question but I am looking at the "star death" image, the planetary nebula. It looks like we are looking through a big hole in a spherical object, or is it a flat ring around the star we are looking at from above? The main reason for my question is that you can see the gas and dust inside the nebula that looks like behind the star it is a solid wall. I imagine when the star explodes it blows stuff out in all directions.