The Magnus Effect, what is the formula/equation?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JordanKnowles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnus Magnus effect
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Magnus Effect, particularly focusing on the search for an equation or formula that describes it. Participants explore theoretical aspects, potential equations, and the underlying physics of the effect as it relates to spinning objects and airflow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help in finding an equation for the Magnus Effect for a physics project.
  • Another participant humorously notes the complexity of explaining the Magnus Effect while clarifying that it involves a deflecting force generated by spinning objects.
  • Some participants mention that while there are idealized formulas for the Magnus Effect, they may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios.
  • A specific equation is presented: f(magnus) = S(v)w x v, prompting questions about the meaning of S(v)w and its components.
  • Clarification is provided that S represents the spin of the ball, w is the angular velocity, and v is the linear velocity, with the equation involving a cross product.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the aerodynamic reasons behind the Magnus Effect and critiques the notion of a reactionless force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of uncertainty regarding the existence of real-world formulas for the Magnus Effect, with some suggesting idealized models may not apply directly. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to understanding the effect and its equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the applicability of idealized formulas to real-world scenarios, and there is a suggestion that definitions and implications in the literature may not be explicitly stated.

JordanKnowles
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently doing a project for my A-Level Physics group, and I have chosen to look into the Magnus Effect, however, I'm struggling to find an equation for it? Really need help here! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I'm not aware of real world formulas. There are idealized formulas for spinning cylinders, but these are fairly off from actual real world examples.

Wiki article, the lift force related to Magnus effect is due to diversion of air flow in the wake that trails the spinning ball:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

Another archived separation of flow explanation:

wayback_machine_magnus_effect.htm
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you! But with the equation f(magnus) = S(v)w x v
What does the S(v)w mean?
Also, in the farside article, what is the B=S/m equation for?
 
S will be the spin of the ball, which is a function of it's speed, w is actually ##\omega## - the angular velocity, and v is the linear velocity. The x in the middle is a cross product. So that's ##S(v)[\vec{\omega} \times \vec{v}]## ... you have to read some of htese things quite carefully since they will gve you the definitions by implication rather than explicitly.

There's quite a bit about the magnus force out there - you should read around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Okay, thank you very much!
 
rcgldr said:
I'm not aware of real world formulas. There are idealized formulas for spinning cylinders, but these are fairly off from actual real world examples.

Wiki article, the lift force related to Magnus effect is due to diversion of air flow in the wake that trails the spinning ball:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

Another archived separation of flow explanation:

wayback_machine_magnus_effect.htm

This has to be the underlying (correct) 'reason' because, otherwise one would have a reactionless force. How the air is deflected must also be for (correct) aerodynamic reasons. As with the concurrent discussion thread on How Aeroplanes Fly, people introduce a similar false dichotomy. Can't we maintain more than one ball in the air at a time (mentally)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
30K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K