- #1
mhsd91
- 23
- 4
So, essentially, all I wonder is: What is the The Matrix Exponent of the Identity Matrix, [itex]I[/itex]?
Silly question perhaps, but here follows my problem. Per definition, the Matrix Exponent of the matrix [itex]A[/itex] is,
[itex]
e^{A} = I + A + \frac{A^2}{2} + \ldots = I + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!}
[/itex]
as [itex]e^0 = I[/itex]. I suspected that, since [itex]I^k = I[/itex] for any integer [itex]k[/itex], we would get
[itex]
e^{I} = I + I + \frac{I}{2} + \ldots = I \cdot \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \right) = I \cdot e,\quad e\approx 2.72
[/itex]
such that for an arbitrary constant [itex]a[/itex] we could write
[itex]
e^{aI} = I \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{a^k}{k!} \right) = I e^{a}
[/itex]
However, apparently this is not the case as a (suggested) solution to some (homework) problem I've been working on claims that
[itex]
e^{aI} = e^{-a} I
[/itex]
With a sign change of a! I think I'm just missing something trivial and fundamental, but I'd really appreciate some help to sort this one out. Might it also be a misprint in the solution?
Silly question perhaps, but here follows my problem. Per definition, the Matrix Exponent of the matrix [itex]A[/itex] is,
[itex]
e^{A} = I + A + \frac{A^2}{2} + \ldots = I + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!}
[/itex]
as [itex]e^0 = I[/itex]. I suspected that, since [itex]I^k = I[/itex] for any integer [itex]k[/itex], we would get
[itex]
e^{I} = I + I + \frac{I}{2} + \ldots = I \cdot \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \right) = I \cdot e,\quad e\approx 2.72
[/itex]
such that for an arbitrary constant [itex]a[/itex] we could write
[itex]
e^{aI} = I \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{a^k}{k!} \right) = I e^{a}
[/itex]
However, apparently this is not the case as a (suggested) solution to some (homework) problem I've been working on claims that
[itex]
e^{aI} = e^{-a} I
[/itex]
With a sign change of a! I think I'm just missing something trivial and fundamental, but I'd really appreciate some help to sort this one out. Might it also be a misprint in the solution?