The Matrix Exponent of the Identity Matrix, I

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Matrix Exponent of the Identity Matrix, denoted as e^I, is calculated using the series expansion e^{A} = I + A + A^2/2 + ... = I * e, where e is approximately 2.72. The discussion clarifies that for an arbitrary constant a, the correct expression is e^{aI} = I * e^{a}. A proposed solution claiming e^{aI} = e^{-a} I is incorrect. This highlights the importance of understanding matrix exponentiation and its properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Matrix exponentiation concepts
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansion
  • Familiarity with the Identity Matrix
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix exponentiation in linear algebra
  • Learn about the Taylor series and its applications in mathematics
  • Explore the implications of the Identity Matrix in various mathematical contexts
  • Investigate common misconceptions in matrix operations and their corrections
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications.

mhsd91
Messages
22
Reaction score
4
So, essentially, all I wonder is: What is the The Matrix Exponent of the Identity Matrix, I?

Silly question perhaps, but here follows my problem. Per definition, the Matrix Exponent of the matrix A is,

<br /> e^{A} = I + A + \frac{A^2}{2} + \ldots = I + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!}<br />

as e^0 = I. I suspected that, since I^k = I for any integer k, we would get

<br /> e^{I} = I + I + \frac{I}{2} + \ldots = I \cdot \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \right) = I \cdot e,\quad e\approx 2.72<br />

such that for an arbitrary constant a we could write

<br /> e^{aI} = I \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{a^k}{k!} \right) = I e^{a}<br />

However, apparently this is not the case as a (suggested) solution to some (homework) problem I've been working on claims that

<br /> e^{aI} = e^{-a} I<br />

With a sign change of a! I think I'm just missing something trivial and fundamental, but I'd really appreciate some help to sort this one out. Might it also be a misprint in the solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mhsd91 said:
<br /> e^{aI} = I \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{a^k}{k!} \right) = I e^{a}<br />
This is correct.

However, apparently this is not the case as a (suggested) solution to some (homework) problem I've been working on claims that

<br /> e^{aI} = e^{-a} I<br />

This is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhsd91
mhsd91 said:
So, essentially, all I wonder is: What is the The Matrix Exponent of the Identity Matrix, I?

Silly question perhaps, but here follows my problem. Per definition, the Matrix Exponent of the matrix A is,

<br /> e^{A} = I + A + \frac{A^2}{2} + \ldots = I + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{A^k}{k!}<br />

as e^0 = I. I suspected that, since I^k = I for any integer k, we would get

<br /> e^{I} = I + I + \frac{I}{2} + \ldots = I \cdot \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \right) = I \cdot e,\quad e\approx 2.72<br />

such that for an arbitrary constant a we could write

<br /> e^{aI} = I \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{a^k}{k!} \right) = I e^{a}<br />

However, apparently this is not the case as a (suggested) solution to some (homework) problem I've been working on claims that

<br /> e^{aI} = e^{-a} I<br />

With a sign change of a! I think I'm just missing something trivial and fundamental, but I'd really appreciate some help to sort this one out. Might it also be a misprint in the solution?
@mhsd91, when you post a question, please do not delete the three parts of the homework template. The template is required.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mhsd91

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K