Unveiling the Mystery of our Spiral Galaxy

AI Thread Summary
The spiral structure of our galaxy was identified through the mapping of neutral hydrogen clouds, particularly using the 21 cm radio wavelength, which is unobstructed by dust. These hydrogen clouds exhibit Doppler shifts that reveal their movement and help outline the galaxy's rotating shape. Early suggestions of the Milky Way's spiral form date back to 1852, with ongoing debates about its place in the universe. Radio astronomers began mapping these structures before 1970, refining their techniques over time by combining data from gas clouds and bright stars. Current maps continue to evolve as new observations are made, enhancing our understanding of the galaxy's structure.
Passionate Eng
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
How did we know that our galaxy is spiral?!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Neutral hydrogen 21 cm line

the spiral arms are copied by clouds of hydrogen. the clouds of hydrogen are moving, their doppler describes rotating shapes. they can be seen and mapped farther away than the galaxy disk stars can because the stars are obscured by dust. But the hydrogen radio wavelength is 21 cm and it is not blocked by dust and it is very precise so the doppler can be measured exactly.

My memory of this is vague. I suppose the spiral arms were being mapped by radio astronomers before 1970 perhaps already before 1960. Wikipedia might have some sources.
 
Last edited:
Huh. Apparently the first suggestion that the Milky Way is a spiral came all the way back in 1852:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?1852AJ...2...97A

The somewhat old language is a bit difficult for me to parse, but it looks like he was inferring the shape from the directions to the stars in the sky. I'm not completely certain, but I *think* this paper was part of an ongoing debate as to whether the Milky Way was the whole of the universe, or whether it was just one of many "nebulae" (at the time, any extended object was called a nebula), the debate that wasn't settled until Hubble definitively showed that what we now call other galaxies are quite far away.

Of course, accurate maps weren't made for quite some time, and they're still refining them. Apparently the best current maps make use of a combination of gas clouds and bright stars. Here's one example:
http://www.americaspace.com/?p=83081
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top