The missing elements in the Periodic Table?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Dmitri Mendeleev's development of the Periodic Table was based on his recognition of patterns among the known elements, which led him to predict the existence of undiscovered elements. His assertion regarding gallium's properties, despite initial skepticism from its discoverer, Paul Emile François Lecoq de Boisbaudran, ultimately proved accurate when Lecoq de Boisbaudran revised his measurements to align with Mendeleev's predictions. This incident highlights Mendeleev's confidence in his theoretical framework over empirical data, a stance that, while controversial, was validated by subsequent discoveries. Science philosopher Eric Scerri noted that Mendeleev's insights into elemental properties surpassed those of the chemist who discovered gallium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Periodic Law and its implications.
  • Familiarity with the historical context of chemistry in the 19th century.
  • Knowledge of basic chemical properties and atomic theory.
  • Awareness of the significance of empirical data in scientific discovery.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical development of the Periodic Table and its key contributors.
  • Explore the properties and significance of gallium in modern chemistry.
  • Investigate the concept of periodicity and its applications in predicting elemental properties.
  • Study the methodologies used in the discovery of new elements in the periodic table.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, historians of science, educators, and anyone interested in the evolution of the Periodic Table and the methodologies of scientific discovery.

FantasyQueen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How did Dimitri Mendeleev know that some of the elements were missing/not discovered? How did he know that the missing elements existed? Did he find some sort of pattern when he created the Periodic Table?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Pattern - yes. Google for ekaboron.
 
Here's an interesting anecdote about an argument between Mendeleev and the Paul Emile François Lecoq de Boisbaudran, the person who discovered Gallium (one of the missing elements whose existence Mendeleev predicted):

Mendeleev picked apart Lecoq de Boisbaudran's data on the new element (soon named gallium). Mendeleev claimed, largely without evidence, that the accomplished Lecoq de Boisbaudran must have made mistakes when measuring gallium's weight and density, since they differed from Mendeleev's predictions.

The chutzpah here is incredible, but Mendeleev tended to trust his own instincts and formulas over mere evidence. Crackpots often do. The difference between Mendeleev and most crackpots is that Mendeleev was right: Lecoq de Boisbaudran soon had to publish an embarrassing retraction about gallium's weight and density, changing them to values that vindicated Mendeleev. According to science philosopher and historian Eric Scerri, "The scientific world was astounded to note that Mendeleev, the theorist, had seen the properties of a new element more clearly than the chemist who had discovered it."
http://www.slate.com/id/2258112/entry/2257317/
 
FantasyQueen said:
How did Dimitri Mendeleev know that some of the elements were missing/not discovered? How did he know that the missing elements existed? Did he find some sort of pattern when he created the Periodic Table?

Doesn't the word "Periodic" imply a pattern? I'm not familiar with the exact history, but I would assume that once periodicity is noted, you just have to fill in the blanks to "discover" new elements. Given a table at this stage:

http://www.click4chill.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/periodic_table.gif

It seems to me that it isn't rocket science to predict the existence of element 113.

Perhaps Medvedev's most astounding feat was to note a periodicity in the properties of the then-discovered elements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
31K
Replies
1
Views
2K