MHB The Missing Intercept: -1,0 in Parametric Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter soroban
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The parametric equations provided describe a unit circle centered at the origin, resulting in the equation x^2 + y^2 = 1. The y-intercepts are found at (0, 1) and (0, -1) when setting x to zero. The x-intercept is determined to be (-1, 0) when y is set to zero, raising the question of the absence of another x-intercept. The discussion hints at a deeper analytical exploration to understand the missing intercept. This analysis emphasizes the unique nature of the parametric representation and its implications for intercepts.
soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Consider the parametric equations: \:\begin{Bmatrix}x &=& \dfrac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \\ y &=& \dfrac{2t}{t^2+1} \end{Bmatrix}

Then: \;x^2 + y^2 \:=\:\left(\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\right)^2 \;=\;\frac{(t^2-1)^2 + (2t)^2}{(t^2+1)^2}

. . . . =\;\frac{t^4-2t^2+1 +4t^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{t^4+2t^2+1}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{(t^2+1)^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;1

We have: \;x^2+y^2\,=\,1, a unit circle centered at the origin.Find the y-intercepts.
Set x=0\!:\;\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t\,=\,\pm1
. . Hence: \;y \:=\:\frac{2(\pm1)}{(\pm1)^2+1} \:=\:\pm1

The y-intercepts are: \;(0,1),\;(0,-1)Find the x-intercepts.
Set y = 0\!:\;\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t \,=\,0
. . Hence: \;x \:=\:\frac{0^2-1}{0^2+1} \:=\:-1

The x-intercept is: \;(-1,0)What happened to the other x-intercept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A way of thinking on it.

You are giving to any point of the unit circle the parametrization given by the equation of a line whose gradient is rational and passes through $(1,0)$, and the parameter is when that line intersect the circle at a point diferent from $(1,0)$, then the point $(1,0)$ is going to infinity since it's line is tangent to the circle through $(1,0)$.
 
Another, purely analytic, way of looking at it:
The second "solution" for $y=0$ is $t= \infty$ because
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{2t}{t^2+1} = 0.$$
So taking the limit as $t \to \infty$ of $x$ gives
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} = 1,$$
and $(x,y) = (1,0).$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Back
Top