The moment of inertia of a solid sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a system consisting of a solid sphere and a rod. The total moment of inertia is derived using the parallel axis theorem, with the sphere's inertia calculated as (2/5)MR² plus an additional term for its distance from the axis. The rod's moment of inertia is confirmed as (1/3)ML² when considering its rotation about the end. Clarification is provided that the total inertia must account for all components rotating about the same axis. The correct answer for the total moment of inertia is affirmed as answer (A).
bluejazz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solid ball of mass M and radius is connected to a thin rod of mass m and length L as shown. What is the moment of inertia of this system about an axis perpendicular to the other end of the rod?

Image: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/35/helpfy.jpg/

Homework Equations



Itotal = MD2 + Icm, where Icm = moment of inertia of the center of mass

The moment of inertia of a solid sphere is given by: 2/5 * mr2
The moment of inertia of a rod being rotated as shown is: 1/3 * mr2

The Attempt at a Solution



The center of mass of the sphere is a distance L away from the axis of rotation and has a moment of inertia of 2/5 * MR2. What I have a problem with is the rod. I know the rod's moment of inertia is given by 1/3 * mr2 (for this situation), and the distance from the center of mass of the rod to the axis of rotation is L/2.

Here is my question: our lecture slides were made goofy and it gives both answer (A) and answer (C) as the correct answer. I think answer (A) is the correct answer because we are calculating Itot by adding the moment of inertia for the solid sphere and rod. With that said, I am still confused if answer (A) is the correct answer because the parallel axis theorem is given by Itotal = MD2 + Icm. Why is the MD2 term just ML2 (mass of sphere a distance L from the axis of rotation), and not the sphere PLUS the rod? I may have worded my questions a little weird, let me know if I am being confusing. Thanks (:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bluejazz said:

The Attempt at a Solution



The center of mass of the sphere is a distance L away from the axis of rotation and has a moment of inertia of 2/5 * MR2. What I have a problem with is the rod. I know the rod's moment of inertia is given by 1/3 * mr2 (for this situation), and the distance from the center of mass of the rod to the axis of rotation is L/2.

Here is my question: our lecture slides were made goofy and it gives both answer (A) and answer (C) as the correct answer. I think answer (A) is the correct answer because we are calculating Itot by adding the moment of inertia for the solid sphere and rod. With that said, I am still confused if answer (A) is the correct answer because the parallel axis theorem is given by Itotal = MD2 + Icm. Why is the MD2 term just ML2 (mass of sphere a distance L from the axis of rotation), and not the sphere PLUS the rod? I may have worded my questions a little weird, let me know if I am being confusing. Thanks (:

Yes A is correct, not C.

For the rod about its own center, I = (1/12)ML2

about its end (like where the axis is in the question) is I = (1/3)ML2

Sphere about the axis in the question = (2/5)ML2+ML2

(the rotating axis for the sphere must be moved to where it is in the diagram. The rotating axis for the rod is already the axis in the question)
 
Okay I get it, thanks for clearing that up for me! I apply the parallel axis theorem to the sphere, and the moment of inertia for a rod with the axis of rotation at the end is (1/3)ML^2
 
bluejazz said:
Okay I get it, thanks for clearing that up for me! I apply the parallel axis theorem to the sphere, and the moment of inertia for a rod with the axis of rotation at the end is (1/3)ML^2

Yep. In order to get the total inertia, all components must be 'brought to rotate about the same axis' if you get what I mean.
 
Yep, makes sense. Thank you for your time!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top