I The name of the 3+1 metric where time is normal to space?

gnnmartin
Messages
86
Reaction score
5
I am interested in looking at the metric where time is everywhere normal to space, so gta=0 everywhere, where t is the time coordinate and 'a' is any of the space coordinates. I'm finding it hard to look up in the literature: does it have a name that I can search for?

My main interest is in seeing which space/times can be described by it, and which (if any) can't. I think I remember that any chart can be re-expressed in this form, but I can't find that in my textbooks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:
No, Minkowski is a special case. The metric I want has no restrictions on gab where a and b are space dimensions (Minkowski by contrast has gab=0 where a≠b).

In the metric I want, only gta and its derivatives are zero.

In particular, I am interested in whether given a spatial 3 space which is part of a time slice of a space/time taken so that time is normal to the 3 surface, is it always possible to extend that throughout the space time? The fact that there are only 6 constrained derivatives (gta,b where b is a space coordinate normal to the edge of the surface bounding the 3 space), suggests it is possible.

I'm then interested in knowing if one can evolve this 3 space forward in time. The fact that there are then only 3 constrained derivatives again suggests it is possible, and if it is not I would like to understand how it becomes impossible.
 
gnnmartin said:
In the metric I want, only gta and its derivatives are zero.

I don't know that there's a general term for a spacetime geometry that meets this condition--that one can find a coordinate chart in which the timelike basis vector ##\partial_t## is everywhere orthogonal to spacelike surfaces of constant time. The term I would use is "hypersurface orthogonal", but that term usually has a more restricted application, to spacetimes with time translation symmetry (a timelike Killing vector field). However, for example, FRW spacetime meets your condition, but it does not have time translation symmetry (it describes an expanding universe).

gnnmartin said:
I am interested in whether given a spatial 3 space which is part of a time slice of a space/time taken so that time is normal to the 3 surface, is it always possible to extend that throughout the space time?

No, it isn't. In fact it's not even possible to find a coordinate chart on every spacetime in which any spacelike surface of constant coordinate time is orthogonal to the timelike basis vector ##\partial_t## at more than one event. For an example, look at Kerr spacetime. Matt Visser's paper is a good resource:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0706.0622.pdf

He discusses a number of possible coordinate charts on Kerr spacetime, but none of them meet your requirement, and I'm pretty sure it's been proven that it is impossible to find one that does on this spacetime.

robphy said:
Possibly useful:

A static spacetime meets the OP's condition, yes, but as above, so does FRW spacetime, which is not static or even stationary. So the condition the OP is interested in is more general.
 
  • Like
Likes gnnmartin
Peter, thanks.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top