String Tension and Pitch: Uncovering the Origins of Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of physics, highlighting the Pythagorean school's discovery of the relationship between string tension and pitch as a potential starting point. It also considers the empirical understanding of geometrical relationships as foundational to physics, predating Euclid's formalization. Aristotelian mechanics is mentioned as a significant early formulation, with Aristotle's works being pivotal in the history of mechanics. The conversation touches on Archimedes' contributions, particularly in statics, which advanced the field further. Ultimately, the definition of "earliest physics" remains open to interpretation, influenced by how one categorizes these early discoveries.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Is the oldest known physics the relation between string tension and pitch, first discovered by the Pythagorean school?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that the oldest physics (although it is often seen as "mathematics") is probably the empirical discovery of certain geometrical relationships, which are nothing else but properties of space (before this was cast in a more comprehensive whole by Euclid).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Might I assume that you mean the earliest formulation of physics? The earliest physics, in my opinion, would be whatever the hell went on when the Big Bang detonated.
 
According to "A History of Mechanics" by Dugas, the first recorded textbook devoted to mechanics (simple machines) orginates with Aristotle (384-322 BC), "or, more accurately, with the author of the probably acrocryphal treatise called 'Problems of Mechanics'. Aristotle wrote other texts as well, including 'Physics' and 'Treatise on the Heavens'.

Archimedes (287-212 BC) made statics an autonomous theoretical science with his treatise on the lever.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top