The philosophy forums: Locked Posts & No Religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sikz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights frustration over the strict enforcement of the no-religion policy in the philosophy forums, with users noting that some philosophical discussions about the existence of a god are being locked unnecessarily. Participants argue that these discussions do not fall under the category of religious posts, which are defined as those that delve into specific religious beliefs. There is a call for administrators to review recently locked posts to ensure that philosophical inquiries are not being unfairly censored. The distinction between discussions about "god" and religious topics is emphasized, suggesting that philosophical perspectives should remain permissible. Overall, the conversation reflects a desire for clearer guidelines and more nuanced moderation in the forums.
Sikz
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
This no religion thing is getting a bit out of hand, wouldn't you agree (preferably someone who actually reads the philosophy forums :P)? I mean... Here's a post. There was absolutely no reason for that to be closed- the no religion thing said no RELIGIOUS posts (EG "How does John 3:16 effect your lifestyle?"), but philosophical discussions about the existence of a god were still fine. That thread (the one the link went to) perfectly fit those criteria, it was a philosophical discussion and not a religious one. It seems like several posts that shouldn't have been locked HAVE been locked lately, and it's rather annoying... Not that I'm asking anyone to just do whatever I say, I would just like the admins to take a look at some of the posts that have been locked lately (like that one) and see if they agree with me. Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
as a member of PF for almost 3 years, i have seen that most of the religious topics turn into high emotional mud slinging...i really don't care to sift through this BS and it is our policy to not have religious discussions...there is always the option of submitting posts from our archives, perhaps you might find a religious discussion that intrigues you there...
 
My very point is that not all of the topics being locked are "religious". (defined by the notice prohibiting them)
 
Originally posted by Sikz
My very point is that not all of the topics being locked are "religious". (defined by the notice prohibiting them)

when we decided to nix the religion forum, we decided to continue discussions regarding "god" in the philosophical perspective...

see this link for further clairification:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1982

religion entails the denominations of belief, "god" doesn't necessarily mean religion...
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top