The point of alternating currents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Currents Point
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept and implications of alternating currents (AC) versus direct currents (DC). Participants explore the nature of AC, its advantages in power transmission, and address common misconceptions about electron movement and current flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the nature of alternating currents, questioning whether AC is a method of storing electrons.
  • Others clarify that AC involves a change in the direction of electron movement, rather than electrons spinning in circles.
  • One participant notes that AC has lower transmission losses compared to DC due to the ability to transform AC to different voltages, which allows for high voltage transmission and reduced current.
  • Another participant mentions that transformers do not work with DC, highlighting a historical context between AC and DC systems.
  • Some participants argue that AC is cheaper and easier to produce and transform for power applications compared to DC.
  • A participant points out the existence of a notable DC transmission line in New Zealand, prompting questions about other DC lines globally.
  • There is mention of advancements in transistor technology that may allow for more efficient DC transmission in the future.
  • One participant shares an analogy comparing AC current to tidal currents to illustrate the flow of energy.
  • Several participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion about the topic, indicating a range of familiarity with electrical concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the advantages of AC versus DC, with multiple competing views presented regarding their respective efficiencies and applications. Some misconceptions about electron behavior are addressed, but uncertainty remains about the overall understanding of AC and DC systems.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved misconceptions about the nature of electron movement and the definitions of current. The discussion also reflects varying levels of technical knowledge among participants, which may influence their interpretations of the topic.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electrical engineering, physics, or those new to electronics seeking to understand the differences between AC and DC currents.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
I'm not sure I understand the point of alternating currents. From what I understand, it's electrons spinning in circles. So, is alternating currents essentially the way we store electrons? That way we keep them spinning around themselves?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm in a little bit of a hurry this morning so for now I'll give you an animation that might help.

"[URL motors and generators
[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure if this animation helps me understand. I get that AC is a sinosoidal wave... I see 4 magnets causing AC motion, whereas 2 magnets cause DC motion... I'm not sure I see how it's related-- it's just more element adding to my confusion!
 
One reason is that DC has higher losses than AC when it comes to transmitting the power to where it is required.
 
Steady on chaps. A few misconceptions here.
Electrons don't spin round in circles. Even with high power AC, the electrons only move at a few mm per second and move back and forth by a small distance with no net movement at all. There are SOOO many electrons in a wire that this seemingly small amount of electron movement corresponds to a high current.

Actually, DC has LOWER losses than AC, for a given voltage and current. However, because you can transform AC to any desired voltage, you can choose to transmit your power at high voltage and then transform it back down to more usable levels. High voltage transmission means lower current which, in turn, means less resistive loss.
It may well be that, as technology produces suitable switching devices, it may be possible to convert DC voltages efficiently and transmission could end up being at DC.

btw, all commonly used generation is basically AC, (because a coil rotates in a magnetic field) followed by rectification if required. The old fashioned 'dynamo' needed a nasty 'commutator' which switched its output constantly in order to produce unidirectional current flow. They were dropped for almost every application as soon as silicon diodes became robust enough - and cheap.
 
One point (advantage) of alternating currents is that transformers don't work on dc currents. This is one of the points of contention between Edison and Westinghouse. See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Currents

Bob S
 
It's as though you guys are speaking Chinese!... I just started out on electronics. I know nothing! But I'll keep looking at sources to see if I can clear my confusion about that issue...thanks
 
This may or may not be more than you've bargained for at this time but poke around a bit and see.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/accircon.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AC current is sort of like a tidal current. the tide rises and current comes rushing in as electrons. then the tide falls and electrons go rushing out. and just like water, all that current has energy. that energy can be transformed or converted. often it is converted to heat. to transfer energy in the form of magnetic fields, the current has to be constantly changing. and that is why AC is used in power transmission. magnetic coupling allows you to increase voltages and decrease current. a decrease in current basically amounts to less energy lost to "friction", or resistance in the wires.

anyhoo, don't worry too much. it took a couple of years before many things started to click with me. and if you haven't had any calculus yet, you may need to take some things on more faith than you would otherwise need. but over time, as it becomes more familiar, things will make more sense.
 
  • #10
Basically, AC has certain advantages that DC doesn't have. It is cheaper to produce in a generator and is much easier to transform into different voltages/currents. Overall it is much cheaper and easier to use AC for power than it is for DC.
 
  • #11
I personally know of only one DC transmission line. Thats in New Zealand, running from the Benmore Hydro in the central South Island to the Wellington, at the bottom end of the North Island. Its a distance of some 500km, and uses 600V.

Wonder if there are any other significant others around the world. ?

Dave
 
  • #12
Femme_physics said:
I'm not sure I understand the point of alternating currents. From what I understand, it's electrons spinning in circles. So, is alternating currents essentially the way we store electrons? That way we keep them spinning around themselves?

Hello!

We need to clear up some misconceptions you have. First, it is true that electrons have a property called "spin" however it doesn't really have anything to do with what we typically call current.

Electrons have a quality we call charge in addition to quality we call spin. When we talk about current we are referring to charge, not spin.

In a circuit we get a current by getting electrons to move. Specifically we define current as the number of electrons that move past a certain point in a given time.

AC current is essentially a change in direction in which the electrons move.

One of the reasons that we use AC current for power lines is that it is a lot easier to change the size of an AC voltage vs. a DC voltage. Transmission lines typically have huge voltages. To get a feel the voltages in your house (if you're in the US) is 120V from an outlet. The voltages in a transmission line are 100-1000 larger than 120V. So we need a way to reduce the voltage. AC transmission lines allow us to use transformers which have no moving parts, low maintenance. DC voltages would require mechanical devices which would need servicing, etc.

So essentially it's a matter of choice and we generally tend to think that AC is better than DC for transmission by looking at the pro's and con's of each.

However we have transistors which act like voltage switches and can control the size of a DC voltage. The problem in the past with using transistors for transmission lines is because in the past transistors could only regulate relatively small voltages however now we can regulate kilovolts using transistors so there is a push to start using DC for power lines.
 
  • #13
davenn said:
I personally know of only one DC transmission line. Thats in New Zealand, running from the Benmore Hydro in the central South Island to the Wellington, at the bottom end of the North Island. Its a distance of some 500km, and uses 600V.

Wonder if there are any other significant others around the world. ?

Dave
Dang. Take a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HVDC_projects#Europe".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
WOW,
thanks Don,

they are going nutz over them in Europe !

Down in the references on that wiki page is a link to the NZ one, looks like its undergoing a total overhaul

Dave
 
  • #15
I think I understand it all better now, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K