The power of a cardinal number to another cardinal number

  • Thread starter Thread starter yaa09d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
yaa09d
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey there!


Is there any formula to determine the power of a cardinal number to another cardinal number?


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general: certainly not. In fact, we can't even find a good formula for 2^{\aleph_0}!

However, there are some partial answers. One of these is the so-called Hausdorff formula which states:

\aleph_{\beta+1}{\aleph_\alpha}=\aleph_{\beta}^{\aleph_\alpha}\aleph_{\beta+1}.

There are some other answers. I'll provide a reference for them: staff.science.uva.nl/~vervoort/AST/ast.ps on page 46 and page 50. (to read the file, you'll need to be able to read .ps file though).

The most satisfying answer to this question happens when you assume AC (axiom of choice) and GCH (generalized continuum hypothesis). In that case, there IS a nice formula for exponentiation:

\aleph_\alpha^{\aleph_\beta}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}<br /> \aleph_\alpha &amp; \text{if}~\aleph_\beta&lt;cf(\aleph_\alpha)\\<br /> \aleph_{\alpha+1} &amp; \text{if}~cf(\aleph_\alpha}\leq \aleph_\beta\leq \aleph_\alpha\\<br /> \aleph_{\beta+1} &amp; \text{if}~\aleph_\alpha&lt;\aleph_\beta<br /> \end{array}\right.

However, GCH is not a generally accept axiom under mathematicians. In fact, most mathematicians think GCH should not be accepted...
 
Thank you for the detailed reply.

I thought if we accept CH, then 2^{\aleph_0}= \aleph_1

Can you recommend me a book to study the basics of cardinal numbers, please? I am a first year grad student. I am not familiar enough with cardinals.
 
Yes, of course, under CH it is true that 2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1. But in general (thus without CH) there is no formula for 2^{\aleph_0}.

And even if we accepted CH as true, then there would still be no formula for 2^{\aleph_1}... The situation for exponentiation is really complex and it's still a very active field of study!

As for books: there are two books which I highly recommend:
- Introduction to set theory by Hrbaced and Jech: this is a great book which is made specially for the beginner. It contains everything of set theory that an average mathematician should know. The discussion of exponentiation is on page 164.
- Set theory by Jech: this is hands-down the best and most comprehensive book on set theory. Unfortunately it is not suited for somebody who is not yet acquainted with some logic and some set theory. So it could be quite tough...
 
Thank you very much.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top