The pre-PhD diploma program at ICTP

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pre-PhD diploma program at ICTP and its potential advantages compared to traditional Master's programs in physics, particularly for those aspiring to pursue a career in theoretical particle physics. Participants explore the necessary foundational knowledge and skills required for advanced research, including specific textbooks and subjects relevant to string theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant emphasizes the importance of a strong background in Quantum Field Theory, Group Theory, General Relativity, and Supersymmetry as essential for tackling research in string theory.
  • Another participant argues that obtaining a Master's degree may not significantly enhance one's qualifications compared to a Bachelor's degree and suggests that pursuing a PhD directly is more beneficial for a career in particle physics.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that diving directly into complex texts like Peskin and Schroeder could be a valid approach, potentially accelerating the learning process for string theory.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the value of a Master's degree, describing it as often perceived as a fallback for those who do not pursue a PhD.
  • There is mention of the European academic context, where a Master's degree is often a prerequisite for PhD programs, contrasting with views on the US system.
  • Questions arise about the necessity of engaging with breakthrough papers and publishing research to be competitive in the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the value of the pre-PhD diploma program versus traditional Master's programs, with no clear consensus on which path is preferable. There is also disagreement regarding the necessity of a Master's degree for a successful career in particle physics.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the limitations of relying solely on specific textbooks for advanced research, indicating that further engagement with research papers and practical experience may be necessary to achieve a competitive level in the field.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I come from an undeveloped country and I am currently near the end of my Bachelor's degree. Currently, I am seriously considering a career as a theoretical particle physicist. Therefore, I would like to apply to Masters programs that enhance my technical skills and enable me to develop required expertise in the following courses:

Quantum Field Theory - all of Peskin and Schroder
Group Theory - all of Georgi
General Relativity - all of Hughston and Tod
Supersymmetry - all of Wess and Bagger

I believe that this is the foundational background to tackle cutting-edge research in string theory. What other subjects might you think I need to complete?

The pre-PhD diploma at ICTP offers the advantage of offering just such a course.The program happens to offer such benefits without the baggage of courses such as graduate-level classical mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. What's your opinion of the diploma program?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Life is too short. Having a Master's in Physics is hardly better than having just a Bachelor's. If you want to be PAID to be a particle physicist, get a PhD. If you want to work along-side of the people who do particle physics, you know: making the coffee, sweeping the floor, installing the wiring, sure get a Master's. If you think it is - in general - a good idea to delay your doctorate, you are wrong. You'll have to decide if the risk of appearing as a second-rate student (for not going directly for your PhD) is balanced by some other personal concerns (eg finance, logistics, competence).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ModusPwnd
That's surely one way to think about the program.

For instance, I hear many people mentioning, for instance, that a good understanding of Peskin and Schroeder requires a first taste with simpler textbooks like Ryder and Mandl, Shaw. But, it might be possible to just dive into the deep end with Peskin and Schroeder on the very first go and come out enlightened in QFT. That way, you just get to go to your goal of learning string theory that much faster.
 
ogg said:
Life is too short. Having a Master's in Physics is hardly better than having just a Bachelor's. If you want to be PAID to be a particle physicist, get a PhD. If you want to work along-side of the people who do particle physics, you know: making the coffee, sweeping the floor, installing the wiring, sure get a Master's. If you think it is - in general - a good idea to delay your doctorate, you are wrong. You'll have to decide if the risk of appearing as a second-rate student (for not going directly for your PhD) is balanced by some other personal concerns (eg finance, logistics, competence).

I agree completely. A masters in physics is generally seen as, and is, a failed PhD. Its not a good thing (in the US). If you want to do cutting edge research in string theory a PhD is necessary but still not sufficient. You need post-docs, good published papers and luck.
 
Hmm... so you guys are saying the pre-PhD diploma program is probably a better alternative to the typical Masters program?
 
ogg said:
Life is too short. Having a Master's in Physics is hardly better than having just a Bachelor's. If you want to be PAID to be a particle physicist, get a PhD. If you want to work along-side of the people who do particle physics, you know: making the coffee, sweeping the floor, installing the wiring, sure get a Master's. If you think it is - in general - a good idea to delay your doctorate, you are wrong. You'll have to decide if the risk of appearing as a second-rate student (for not going directly for your PhD) is balanced by some other personal concerns (eg finance, logistics, competence).
You don't have to do either-or if you go to Europe. Here Master+PhD is similar to a US-PhD.
failexam said:
I believe that this is the foundational background to tackle cutting-edge research in string theory.
Well, you won't do cutting-edge research just with those books, but you get some chance to get an idea of some papers. Getting to the level of actual research needs more time.
 
After studying the above textbooks, do I have to read breakthrough papers in my specific field of interest (say, string theory, or supersymmetry, or GUT, etc.) to become up to par?
 
You need to publish papers under the supervision of a physicist in the field and present you work to peers to be on par.
 
mfb said:
You don't have to do either-or if you go to Europe. Here Master+PhD is similar to a US-PhD.
Indeed. In fact, most European universities will not accept you for a PhD position unless you have a master degree.
 

Similar threads

Other How can I fill course requirements for Physics Master's program?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Programs University of Edinburgh or King's College London for mathematical physics masters?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Programs Electrical Engineering PhD or Applied Physics PhD?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Admissions Direct Entry to PhD Program -- Advice Please
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Theoretical Physics: 1 year long Pre-PhD-Programs
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Programs PhD in pure Maths and... Physics
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Admissions What are my chances of getting into a competitive physics PhD program?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Programs Applying To a PhD program before finishing your master's degree
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Admissions Statement of purpose critique request (high-energy theory PhD application)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Programs Need advice about applying to Ph.D. programs
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K