The question is: What are the limits for theta and is the working correct?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a system of blocks and their motion, specifically focusing on the limits for the angle theta (θ) and the correctness of the working shown by the original poster. The subject area includes dynamics and kinematics, with references to forces and accelerations in a non-standard setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the angle θ and the motion of the blocks, questioning the limits for θ based on the initial and final configurations. There are discussions about treating forces as real or fictitious and the implications for calculating acceleration. Some participants express confusion about the integration limits and the setup of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and raising questions about the setup and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of forces and the analogy to gravitational fields, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or limits for θ.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of differential equations and the definitions of variables involved in the problem. Participants are also grappling with the implications of treating certain forces as real versus fictitious.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Consider the system at time t (see attachment, I am representing the blocks as point masses)
The component of acceleration along the string is ##a_0\cos \theta##. This is the acceleration of the other two blocks at the sides. The component of acceleration along the horizontal direction is ##a_0 \sin \theta \cos \theta##.
[tex]v\frac{dv}{dx}=a_0 \sin \theta \cos \theta[/tex]
As ##x=l\sin \theta##, ##dx=l\cos \theta d\theta##
[tex]vdv=a_0 \sin \theta \cos^2 \theta d\theta[/tex]
The problem is, what should be the limits for ##\theta##? And is my working even correct?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • blocks1.jpg
    blocks1.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 397
  • blocks2.png
    blocks2.png
    14 KB · Views: 448
  • blocks3.png
    blocks3.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 419
Physics news on Phys.org
I would consider this in the frame of block B. You get a very common physical setup, which can be solved without differential equations.

The limits for θ are given by the initial layout and the final one (collision).
 
mfb said:
I would consider this in the frame of block B. You get a very common physical setup, which can be solved without differential equations.

So there will be pseudo force acting on the other two blocks? But then how would I calculate the acceleration in the horizontal direction?

mfb said:
The limits for θ are given by the initial layout and the final one (collision).
Are the limits 0 to pi/2?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
So there will be pseudo force acting on the other two blocks? But then how would I calculate the acceleration in the horizontal direction?
Once you see the analogy, it is easy ;). You can even treat it as real force...

Are the limits 0 to pi/2?
Sure.
 
mfb said:
Once you see the analogy, it is easy ;). You can even treat it as real force...

Sorry, I am still lost on this one. :frown:

mfb said:
Sure.

But that doesn't give me the right answer. I had the following expression:
[tex]\int_{0}^v vdv=\int_{0}^{\pi/2} a_0 \ell \sin \theta \cos^2 \theta d\theta[/tex]
[tex]\frac{v^2}{2}=\frac{a_0 \ell}{3}[/tex]
This is incorrect as per the answer key. :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Sorry, I am still lost on this one. :frown:
Both blocks will feel a fictious force of m*a0 "downwards" acting on them.
Just consider that as real force, and you get a
pendulum in a gravitational field.
 
mfb said:
Both blocks will feel a fictious force of m*a0 "downwards" acting on them.
Just consider that as real force, and you get a
pendulum in a gravitational field.

How is that a pendulum in a "gravitational field" when the motion takes horizontally? :confused:

And why does my DE gives the wrong answer? :(
 
The motion is the same as if the setup would be in a gravitational field (with gravity acting "sidewards"). It is not in a relevant real gravitational field, of course.

And why does my DE gives the wrong answer? :(
I don't know. What is v (in which frame)? Why did you introduce x?

The question asks to find the relative velocity of A and C, while you just calculated the velocity of A (or C). That factor of 3 should not appear, however.
 
mfb said:
The motion is the same as if the setup would be in a gravitational field (with gravity acting "sidewards"). It is not in a relevant real gravitational field, of course.

Ah yes, I get your point. It turns out to be same as if the motion takes place in gravity.
[tex]ma_0\ell=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \Rightarrow v=\sqrt{2a_0 \ell}[/tex]
Hence the relative velocity before striking is ##2\sqrt{2a_0 \ell}##

Thank you mfb! :smile:

mfb said:
I don't know. What is v (in which frame)?
v is in inertial frame.

mfb said:
Why did you introduce x?
Acceleration is vdv/dx so I had to introduce x and express it in terms of ##\theta##.
 
  • #10
Pranav-Arora said:
v is in inertial frame.
That is complicated. In particular, you don't get the relative velocity with that, and "v" as integration limit does not make sense (it is a vector).

Anyway, treating it like a pendulum is way easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K