I The Rabi Problem: Solving with the Semiclassical Approach

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vineesha
  • Start date Start date
Vineesha
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What is the Rabi problem? How to solve it using the semiclassical approach? I am looking for content which is easy to understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It usually means a problem of a two-level system where the state vectors have only two complex number components, and the Hamiltonian is a ##2\times 2## matrix that has a periodic time dependence, as in

##H = \begin{bmatrix}a & b\sin \omega t \\ b\sin \omega t & c\end{bmatrix}## .

Then you use time dependent perturbation theory or some other method to find the evolution of some initial state vector. The most appropriate way may depend on how large the frequency ##\omega## is.

EDIT: A practical application of this could be a system where an atom in ground state is subjected to an electromagnetic wave with low amplitude and frequency ##\omega## that is chosen in such a way that it's unlikely that the atom will be excited to any other but a single excited state. Then you can think of it as an effective two-level system even though any atom has an infinite number of energy eigenstates in principle.
 
  • Like
Likes Vineesha
hilbert2 said:
It usually means a problem of a two-level system where the state vectors have only two complex number components, and the Hamiltonian is a ##2\times 2## matrix that has a periodic time dependence, as in

##H = \begin{bmatrix}a & b\sin \omega t \\ b\sin \omega t & c\end{bmatrix}## .

Then you use time dependent perturbation theory or some other method to find the evolution of some initial state vector. The most appropriate way may depend on how large the frequency ##\omega## is.

EDIT: A practical application of this could be a system where an atom in ground state is subjected to an electromagnetic wave with low amplitude and frequency ##\omega## that is chosen in such a way that it's unlikely that the atom will be excited to any other but a single excited state. Then you can think of it as an effective two-level system even though any atom has an infinite number of energy eigenstates in principle.
Thank you very much. However, I wish to work out the exact mathematics of the problem. Can you suggest a good, easy book for this?
 
The Bransden & Joachain's "Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed." I have myself seems to contain this in Chapter 9.

The idea is to write the state of the system as a vector with two time-dependent components,

##\left|\right.\psi (t) \left.\right> = \begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix}##

and then make the time dependent Schrödinger equation

##i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix} = H\begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix}##,

where ##H## is a matrix like that in my previous post. Now you have two coupled differential equations for the functions ##a(t),b(t)## and they can be solved with some kind of approximations.
 
  • Like
Likes Vineesha and vanhees71
hilbert2 said:
The Bransden & Joachain's "Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed." I have myself seems to contain this in Chapter 9.

The idea is to write the state of the system as a vector with two time-dependent components,

##\left|\right.\psi (t) \left.\right> = \begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix}##

and then make the time dependent Schrödinger equation

##i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix} = H\begin{bmatrix}a(t) \\ b(t)\end{bmatrix}##,

where ##H## is a matrix like that in my previous post. Now you have two coupled differential equations for the functions ##a(t),b(t)## and they can be solved with some kind of approximations.
Thanks a lot!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top