The Re-Inventors: Ignoring Physics & Causing More Harm Than Good?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borek
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques a show on Discovery Channel, expressing frustration over its disregard for basic physics principles in experiments. Specific examples include a WWI helmet gun, where the potential for neck injury from recoil was overlooked, and a pedal-powered helicopter that was not accurately explained, particularly its tendency to rotate around its axis. The commentator contrasts this show unfavorably with "Mythbusters," which, despite occasional inaccuracies, respects fundamental conservation laws. There is a broader concern that such programming misleads the public about scientific concepts. The discussion also touches on the decline in quality of Discovery Channel's content, referencing other shows like "A Haunting" and "Ghost Lab." A suggestion is made for a show that would effectively demonstrate engineering and scientific principles by explaining the functionality of inventions. Overall, there is a call for more responsible and educational programming in the realm of science and engineering.
Borek
Mentor
Messages
29,123
Reaction score
4,541
I have just seen part of one episode on Discovery. What a morons... They do what each crackpot does - they ignore the physics, as if they have never heard about it.

I have seen WWI helmet gun - they silently ignored the fact that recoil will break the neck (to some extent they were aware of the problem, as they put a plank behind dummy just to make it stiffer). Then tehy were trying pedal powered helicopter - and they elected to not mention fact that such approach can't work, as it will rotate around its own axis. If you ask me - they do more harm than good to general public.

Mythbusters are not always correct, but at least they don't ignore in the most blatant manner basic conservation laws.

Discovery Channel has just lost a lot in my eyes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen episodes of this show, but I lost respect long ago from shows like A Haunting. Now they feature stuff like Ghost Lab.
 
What show is this? I googled it and the first page was a page of torrents to download episodes!
 
Based on the description on Wiki and having never seen it, I think a show that did this and then took the time to explain why the invention does or doesn't work would be a nice visual aid for demonstrating different engineering/scientific principles. Whether or not the show actually does this though I can not say.
 
Pattonias said:
Based on the description on Wiki and having never seen it, I think a show that did this and then took the time to explain why the invention does or doesn't work would be a nice visual aid for demonstrating different engineering/scientific principles.

Agreed. I have nothing against the general idea of the show.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top