The risk of a superconducting cable exploding

Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the inherent risks associated with superconducting cables, particularly the potential for explosion if a section of the cable exceeds its critical temperature and develops resistance. This phenomenon, governed by the I²R law, poses a threat to all types of superconducting cables, including both low and high-temperature variants. To mitigate this risk, current superconducting designs incorporate a parallel copper conductor that can handle the current in the event of a quench. This safety feature is crucial for preventing overheating and potential failure. Overall, understanding these risks is essential for the safe implementation of superconducting technology.
jeffinbath
Gold Member
Messages
39
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
If the goal of achieving a room temperature superconducting cable were to fully succeed , would there not always be an explosion risk?
In a future supposed “room temperature” superconducting cable that is carrying a large current (I ), would there not always be a risk of explosion if part of the cable accidentally reached a higher critical temperature so that this part suddenly developed a resistance (R) and all the power would heat the cable following the I2 R law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the case for all superconducting cables, not just room temperature superconductors. Superconducting cables, using both low temperature superconductors like Nb-Ti and high temperature copper oxide based superconductors are a reality today. For the reasons you stated, these always have a copper conductor in parallel with the superconductor to carry the current if the superconductor gets "quenched". You can see that in this diagram of a HTSC cable.

Screenshot 2025-01-20 at 2.04.41 PM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes crashcat, jeffinbath and berkeman
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K