The set of ring automorphisms is an abstract group under composition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that the set of ring automorphisms, denoted as Aut(R), forms a group under composition. The original poster draws a parallel to a similar proof regarding group automorphisms, Aut(G).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply reasoning from the proof of Aut(G) to Aut(R), questioning whether the two proofs are essentially the same. Some participants inquire about the use of inverses in the context of automorphisms and the definitions involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the similarities and differences between the proofs for group and ring automorphisms. Participants are questioning the definitions and assumptions related to automorphisms, particularly regarding the existence of inverses.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses concern about the application of group properties to rings, specifically regarding the necessity of inverses in the context of ring automorphisms.

catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Aut(R) denotes the set of ring automorphisms of a ring R Show formally that Aut(R) is a group under composition.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I Have a very similar question to which I have the solution viz


Aut(G) denotes the set of group automorphisms of a Group G, show that Aut(G) is a group under composition.


Proof Let a,b: G -> G be automorphisms

then [tex]a\circ b: G \rightarrow g is also an auto[/tex]

[tex](a\circ b)(xy) = a(b(xy))=a(b(x)b(y))= a(b(x))a(b(y))[/tex]
[tex]=(a\circ b)(x)(a\circ b)(y)[/tex]

so [tex]a\circb[/tex] is a homomorphism

it is also bijective since a,b are bijective

[tex]\circ: aut(G)\times aut(G) \rightarrow aut(G)[/tex]
is automatically associative (because comp of mappings is associative)

As identity in Aut(G) [tex]take Id_g:G \rightarrow G[/tex]
finally inverses

Let a: G --> G be an auto

then a^-1:G -->G is atleast a mapping and bijective

need only show

[tex]a^-1(xy) = a^-1(x)a^-1(y)[/tex]

let [tex]x,y \in G[/tex]

choose [tex]c,d \in G[/tex] : a(c)=x, a(d)=y

[tex]a^-1(xy) = a^-1(a(c)a(d))=a^-1(a(cd)) = cd= a^-1(x)a^-1(y)[/tex]

q.e.d



...the proof for rings is essentially the same right? The only thing that concerns me is the last part(above) since we used the fact that every element has it's inverse in a group but we don't have that in a ring...:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where have you used that fact?
 
ok so i haven't and these two proofs are essentially the same?
 
You did use a-1 where a is automorphism. You say you know
Aut(G) denotes the set of group homomorphisms of a Group G, show that Aut(G) is a group under composition.

Are you sure of that definition of Aut(G)? Homomorphism, in general, do not have inverses.
 
no I've made a mistake it's supposed to be the group of isomorphisms
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K