The simple yet best challenge i ve ever seen

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hercules68
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario involving a mass 'm' moving at velocity 'v' that is suddenly increased to '2m' without energy loss. Participants explore the implications of this scenario on conservation of momentum and energy, examining how kinetic energy is affected during the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the mass increases from 'm' to '2m', the new velocity could be calculated using conservation of momentum as (old velocity) / 2, while others suggest using conservation of energy leads to a new velocity of (old velocity) / (root 2).
  • One participant asserts that kinetic energy is not conserved in this process, likening it to a non-elastic collision.
  • Another participant questions how energy is lost if the object has an ideal adhesive that allows particles to stick to it.
  • A participant explains that internal forces, such as friction, would slow down the first body and accelerate the second body, resulting in a loss of kinetic energy.
  • One analogy presented involves a train colliding with a car, illustrating that kinetic energy is expended in the collision, leading to a loss of energy.
  • Another participant notes that energy is lost as heat only if there is relative motion between the bodies after contact, and questions how one body could speed up another without relative motion or deformation.
  • One participant discusses the mathematical aspect, stating that the squared velocity in the energy formula results in a significant reduction in energy when velocity is halved.
  • Another participant argues that it is theoretically possible to have zero relative motion in an ideal rigid body, questioning where the energy loss occurs.
  • A later reply counters that zero relative motion would imply infinite force and suggests that participants reconsider their assumptions about the scenario.
  • One participant challenges the framing of the problem, suggesting that understanding conservation laws in particle systems could clarify the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the conservation of energy and momentum in the described scenario. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing interpretations of how energy is lost or conserved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of the collision, the properties of the bodies involved, and the implications of ideal conditions versus real-world scenarios.

hercules68
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
the simple yet best challenge i ve ever seen !

Fine let's keep it simple

Assume a mass of 'm' moving at velocity 'v'.

now if I somehow increase the mass of it to '2m' (by some means as a mass sticking on to it newly ... or any other means of no loss of energy ... now don't tell me its impossible )

by conservation of momentum ...

new velocity = ( old velocity ) / 2

by conservation of energy

new velocity = ( old velocity ) / (root 2)

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


hercules68 said:
Fine let's keep it simple

Assume a mass of 'm' moving at velocity 'v'.

now if I somehow increase the mass of it to '2m' (by some means as a mass sticking on to it newly ... or any other means of no loss of energy ... now don't tell me its impossible )

by conservation of momentum ...

new velocity = ( old velocity ) / 2

by conservation of energy

new velocity = ( old velocity ) / (root 2)

??
The kinetic energy is not conserved in this process. It's like a non-elastic collision.
 


fine if the object has some ideal adhesive over it ... then few particles stick to it

how is the energy lost
 


The whole second body will be attached to the first one. This is what you said.
Not just some particles.

You have initially one object moving with velocity v and another one at rest.
When you put them in contact the internal forces (maybe friction) will accelerate the second body and slow down the first one so you end up with both moving with the same speed.
These internal forces are the ones decreasing the kinetic energy of the system.
 


Imagine the first body is a train and the second body is a car on a crossing. Some of the kinetic energy of the train is expended making a mess of the car.

If you change the scale so that you have a smaller object that is moving more slowly there is much less kinetic energy; when it hits something it makes less of a mess (perhaps just a bit of noise and heat), but all you have done is change the scale not the principal so kinetic energy is always lost in the collision.
 


energy is lost as heat only if there is relative motion between the bodies after contact. and if this happens in vacuum there is no sound as well
 


hercules68 said:
energy is lost as heat only if there is relative motion between the bodies after contact. and if this happens in vacuum there is no sound as well

.. or one or both of the bodies deform after contact. How is the first body going to speed up the second body unless there is either relative motion or deformation?

You are coming at it from the wrong angle, clearly the kinetic energy is converted somewhere, look for where it could be going and that is where you are likely to find it!
 


Superficially, the loss is built into the formula:

The energy is lost because the velocity is squared in the energy formula. Cutting the velocity in half results in a 4:1 reduction ratio of that factor, while doubling the mass merely doubles that factor. (Example: 82 gets you 64 to multiply by the mass, but half that velocity, 4, squared only gets you 16 to multiply by the mass, a reduction of 4:1.)
 


considering an ideal rigid body upon which the laws hold true it is possible to have zero relative motion and by the way where is the energy lost !
 
  • #10


hercules68 said:
it is possible to have zero relative motion

No it isn't, this would imply instantaneous acceleration and therefore infinite force. I am going to leave you to think this out for yourself now.
 
  • #11


hercules68 said:
considering an ideal rigid body upon which the laws hold true it is possible to have zero relative motion and by the way where is the energy lost !

It may be the case that you don't understand your own problem?
The two bodies do have relative motion, to start with. It has nothing to do with their rigidity or other properties. One is moving with v, the other is at rest. Or maybe they both move with v, from the beginning?

If it's the first case, as they end up by moving together after they get in contact, there must be some interaction force between the two bodies. You can even assume that the second body accelerates instantaneously (and the second decelerates same way). You'll have an infinitely large force acting for an infinitely short time. The final effect: change in relative speed and change in kinetic energy.

I don't understand why you call this a challenge.
If you read a little bit about plastic collisions or conservation laws in systems of particles it should became less challenging.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K