The Stable Universe: Human/Alien Intelligence & Time Travel Possibilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Causal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stable Universe
Causal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Leaving all knowledge aside for the moment...

There seems to be two stable states for the universe

1. Void. There is no universe because there's no natural phenomena to bring it into existence.

2. An intelligent universe. Here the intelligence has devised a way of bringing itself into existence. This 'way' manifests itself as the universe as we know it. Hence, future scientists are the intelligence.

As we know the universe is real, therefore state 2 rules. Human/Alien intelligence acted as the force that brought the universe into existence.

State 2 implies time travel will one day be possible.

Causal


Does anybody have any comment on the above? Thanking you in advance.

o:)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Causal said:
1. Void. There is no universe because there's no natural phenomena to bring it into existence.

But there is a universe. The void is part of the universe. The universe may be the natural phenomena that brought it into existence.

2. An intelligent universe. Here the intelligence has devised a way of bringing itself into existence. This 'way' manifests itself as the universe as we know it. Hence, future scientists are the intelligence.

That's just ludicrous in my opinion. A universe with "intelligence"? You question all these phenomenas because you exist. The universe doesn't have to possesses "intelligence" to provide the right conditions for living organisms to start growing.

As we know the universe is real, therefore state 2 rules. Human/Alien intelligence acted as the force that brought the universe into existence.

Whatever created the universe cannot create its own self. Its perpetual I'm afraid, it goes on and on, hence why I believe that everything is reduced to nothing.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top