Does Time Exist Without Physical Progress in the Space Time Unit Structure?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between time and physical progress, asserting that time only exists alongside physical changes. It posits that without progress, time is non-existent, and that moments are human constructs rather than natural phenomena. The conversation delves into the complexities of time and space dimensions, suggesting that time is influenced by other dimensions and that physical progress is essential for time to be meaningful. Additionally, it touches on quantum mechanics and experimental observations that challenge traditional understandings of time and progress. Ultimately, the dialogue emphasizes the need for deeper exploration of these concepts within a framework that may not align with conventional theories.
hey.like
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

To part away the complexity, all events or progresses are in Relativity reference frame.
The time axiom1 as follow: Time is with a physical progress always. perhaps progresses may be more than one.
If there is not a physical progress , the time isn't exist. If the time is mean clearnly, the moment is mean clearnly with the time. naturely the moment concepts is humans and part away the nature.
The time space unit in a space point progress structure as follow:
1: there is not a time progress in a point;
2: A time-space progress is in one dimension on a tiny time, this progress is repelled by another no time dimensions and to hold in primary, that is a oppesite action actted on a time dimension by another dimensions;
3: Time dimension progress is not to return first, but to slip another dimension in a space pointted progress, this is to form a dimensions controlled time dimension structure.
In a time dimension progress, time progress is bindded by another dimension, this action reason is from same progress action.
If the space dimension action is not complete, the time dimension progress will be to move, specially in one time and one dimension situation, this progress is blackade with this world, like black hole, heavy string progress. In this situation, the Relativity reference frame is meaningless. If a physical progress is not a referce action with it. What can do to right?
If a progress with a complete dimension action, it is a enable to repeat progress, if the action dimensions is opening, this progress isn't enable to repeat.
In complete dimension, it can be 3, 5, 7... and another structure, the time dimension progress is permit in high dimension progress.
In quantum size, blockade and unpermit progress is taking a important position, it's advantage is to build the time space structure base.
In experiment test, if the neutronoreaction reaction in mass exist, different energy level , it is existed a reaction life longged factor as m in time dimension progress to reduce to zero.
In another test, in laser cold condense charge near 0 K with E radiation . There is some charge quantum decrease.
The theory in Relativity reference frame isn't same ub generak situation, the physical theory is same right all as usual.



 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hey, like

how do I know you are serious? I read your post and sometimes I think we may be talking. But the thoughts you seem to want to discuss are rare here, and I have little success getting my own view to make any sense to anyone.

Still, I have an idea about dimensions in which timespace does not move, and so forms a spacetime structure (lattice) on which all we know is expressed.

No promises. But at least maybe we outcasts can try to talk to each other.

Richard T. Harbaugh
 
UC Berkely, December 16, 2025 https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/12/16/whats-powering-these-mysterious-bright-blue-cosmic-flashes-astronomers-find-a-clue/ AT 2024wpp, a luminous fast blue optical transient, or LFBOT, is the bright blue spot at the upper right edge of its host galaxy, which is 1.1 billion light-years from Earth in (or near) a galaxy far, far away. Such objects are very bright (obiously) and very energetic. The article indicates that AT 2024wpp had a peak luminosity of 2-4 x...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
772
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
10K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K