- #1
Kherubin
- 47
- 0
The views important to this thread are probably best espoused in the following video and paper:
http://www.closertotruth.com/video-profile/Asking-Ultimate-Questions-Max-Tegmark-/888
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510188
I am interested in the opinion of others with regard to this 'ontological triangle'.
Do people think it exists and is it a valid description/exploration of reality?
Which of the three pillars is most 'fundamental'?
Does that question even make sense?
I'd love to hear what you have to say, so please discuss away!
Thanks,
Kherubin
http://www.closertotruth.com/video-profile/Asking-Ultimate-Questions-Max-Tegmark-/888
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510188
Piet Hut said:We discuss the nature of reality in the ontological context of Penrose's math-matter-mind triangle. The triangle suggests the circularity of the widespread view that math arises from the mind, the mind arises out of matter, and that matter can be explained in terms of math. -- On Math, Matter and Mind
I am interested in the opinion of others with regard to this 'ontological triangle'.
Do people think it exists and is it a valid description/exploration of reality?
Which of the three pillars is most 'fundamental'?
Does that question even make sense?
I'd love to hear what you have to say, so please discuss away!
Thanks,
Kherubin
Last edited by a moderator: