The Unruh effect and light beams

[notknowing]

According to the Unruh effect, an accelerating observer will find himself surrounded by a "warm bath" of particles (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect ). Now consider two observers,A and B, one accelerating (B) and the other (A) in constant motion (or rest). Let the accelerated observer now shine a beam of light away from him. This beam of light can now be scattered by the particles surrounding him (which exist only to him and not to A). This means that the observer A will see some strange deviations of the light leaving the accelerated observer (even when the effect would be very small). This would look even more strange, considering the fact that A sees no particles at all (from which the light could scatter). To observer A, it would appear that the light is scattered by the vacuum itself. I was wondering whether such effects could also have implications for the observation of other stars, galaxies, the cosmic background, etc. Does anyone know of such considerations being taking into account in cosmology ?

 

[Chris Hillman]

Suggest reposting this question in sci.physics.research

Hi again, notknowing, you might try reposting this question in sci.physics.research with a subject line such as "A question for Ted Jacobson" (see http://www.glue.umd.edu/~jacobson/) . He sometimes posts in that group and has discussed the Unruh effect in the past. Steve Carlip is another poster who could probably help you out better than I can.

You might also be interested in two recent arXiv eprints, http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611062 and http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611067, but as always remember that physics is hard, possibly even too hard for humans :-/

Chris Hillman

 

[notknowing]

Hi again, notknowing, you might try reposting this question in sci.physics.research with a subject line such as "A question for Ted Jacobson" (see http://www.glue.umd.edu/~jacobson/) . He sometimes posts in that group and has discussed the Unruh effect in the past. Steve Carlip is another poster who could probably help you out better than I can.

You might also be interested in two recent arXiv eprints, http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611062 and http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611067, but as always remember that physics is hard, possibly even too hard for humans :-/

Chris Hillman

Hi Chris,
Nice to see a response to my question. I'll look further into this.
PS : The (first) link to Jacobson did not work.
I'm glad to hear that, even to an expert, physics is hard !

Rudi